Did a California employee owe use tax when her employer awarded her the automobile she had previously leased?

Short answer No, if the contest sponsor paid the tax due when acquiring the car from the leasing company. The transfer to the winner could then be exempt, subject to obtaining the required registration exemption form.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.1150
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1969-02-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A California employee who won her previously leased automobile (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1969. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1969
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Feb. 24, 1969 tax-counsel letter assumes the sponsor acquired the previously leased vehicle and conditions the winner's result on sponsor tax payment and later verification. The PDF does not reproduce the undated request or envelope, lease, title, registration, contest rules or winner record, sponsor acquisition agreement or invoice, tax payment, sponsor identity or address, exemption application, Form BT-111, or DMV action. CDTFA's current annotation states the general sponsor-and-winner result but omits the statutory transfer path and incomplete form procedure. Another taxpayer should check current vehicle prize, lease, acquisition, title, registration, sponsor tax, evidence, exemption form, and sales-and-use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A California employee had leased a car for three years, then won that same car in an employer-sponsored contest. The sponsor apparently acquired it from the leasing company for the award.

The letter placed use tax on the leasing-company transfer to the contest sponsor under the cited statute. If the sponsor paid the tax on the prize property, the contest winner had no separate tax liability.

The winner still needed a Board exemption form for vehicle registration, and the agency requested the sponsor's name and address before issuing it.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6292
  • Winner's undated request postmarked Feb. 3, 1969 — facts and question recited; letter, envelope, attachments, and vehicle records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Three-year Colorado-company lease, employer-sponsored contest, award of the same car, presumed sponsor acquisition, sponsor tax payment condition, vehicle registration, and Form BT-111 — facts supplied or assumed and procedure identified; lease, title, registration, contest rules and winner record, sponsor acquisition agreement and invoice, tax payment, sponsor identity and address, exemption application, form, and DMV action not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 280.1150's California employee, leased car, contest award, no-winner-tax, and sponsor-use-tax summary — annotation omits the section 6292 transfer path, sponsor-payment condition, missing sponsor information, and Form BT-111 procedure and supplies no additional transaction record
  • Possible later sponsor identification, tax payment, form issuance, registration, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

280.1150

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

February 24, 1969
Ms. A--- K--- O--XXXXX --- Road, #XXX
---, CA XXXXX
SR --- XX XXXXXX
J--- L---, Inc.
Dear Ms. O---:
This is in response to your undated letter postmarked February 3, 1969, with reference to use tax applicable to the transfer of a car which you received as a contest winner. We understand that the car was leased by you for three years prior to the contest from the J--- L--- Corporation of ---, Colorado; that your employer sponsored the contest in which you were the winner of the car previously leased by you. The sponsor of the contest presumably obtained the car from the above-leasing company for the purpose of awarding it to the winner. Under the above facts, use tax is due pursuant to section 6292 of the Sales and Use Tax Law, on the transfer from the leasing company to the contest sponsor. We have ruled that where the promoter has paid the tax on the property awarded to the contest winner, there is no liability upon the contest winner for the tax. Accordingly, it appears that the transfer to you may be exempt. In order for you to claim the exemption, upon registration of the car, it is necessary that we issue an exemption Form BT-111 to you. However, before we can do so, we must have the name and address of the contest sponsor. Upon receipt of this information, we will initiate the appropriate exemption form for you. Very truly yours,

T. P. Putnam
Tax Counsel
BY_____
Joseph Manarolla
JM:smb

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1969. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace