Were promotional devices bought from a manufacturer and resold to appliance dealers at or below cost taxable retail sales?

Short answer Yes. The distributor acquired the devices for resale and made the taxable retail sales to its dealers. Tax was measured by the distributor's actual charge, even when that amount was below its cost.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.0880
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1954-05-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A household-appliance distributor selling promotional devices to dealers (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1954. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1954
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 19, 1954 assistant-counsel letter addresses one completed and one planned appliance-promotion-device program. The PDF does not reproduce the inquiry, product specifications, promotion terms, manufacturer and distributor agreements, orders, invoices, payments, dealer billings, delivery records, gross-receipts records, returns, or tax computations. CDTFA's current annotation generalizes the appliance and exact price facts and supplies no implementation evidence. Another taxpayer should check current promotion-device, manufacturer, distributor, dealer, resale, below-cost sale, consideration, invoicing, recordkeeping, gross-receipts, and sales-and-use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A household-appliance distributor bought small electric signs for $20 each and supplied them to dealers for $10. In a later program, a manufacturer bought promotional devices for $167, sold them to the distributor for $83.50, and the distributor planned to bill dealers the same $83.50.

The letter treated the manufacturer-to-distributor transactions as sales for resale and the distributor-to-dealer transactions as taxable retail sales.

Tax was measured by the distributor's actual gross receipts from each dealer: $10 for each sign in the first program and $83.50 for each device in the second, despite the below-cost or at-cost pricing.

Citations and references

  • The source letter cites no statute or regulation by number.
  • Distributor's earlier $20 electric-sign cost and $10 dealer charge, later manufacturer's $167 device cost and $83.50 distributor price, and planned $83.50 dealer billing — facts and amounts supplied; inquiry, promotional programs, product specifications, manufacturer and distributor agreements, orders, invoices, payments, dealer billings, delivery records, gross-receipts records, returns, and tax computations not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 280.0880's manufacturer sale for resale, distributor taxable retail sale, at-or-below-cost pricing, and actual-charge measure — annotation generalizes the appliance and price facts and supplies no additional transaction or implementation record
  • Possible later device purchase or sale, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

280.0880

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

May 19, 1954

H. R. B--- Co.
XXX XXth Street
--- --- X, California
Account No. X - XXX
SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Attention:

Mr. W. P. M--Secretary

Gentlemen:
You are a distributor of the larger type of household appliances and several years ago you purchased some small electric signs to be used in connection with the promotion of one of your merchandise lines. The signs cost you $20.00 each, but you furnished them to your dealers at $10.00 each. You have a similar situation arising again except that the manufacturer has obtained the sales promotion devices at a cost of $167.00 each. They are furnishing them to you at one-half price or $83.50 each. You, in turn, will bill them to your dealers at $83.50. It is our opinion that in both cases you are acquiring the items for resale and your sale to your dealer is the retail sale and subject to tax. The measure of tax is your gross receipts from this retail sale, in the first instance $10.00 for each sign and in the second instance $83.50 for each device. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Assistant Counsel

BH/ja
cc:

--- --- - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1954. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace