Who sold premium merchandise to grocers who earned points for selling a manufacturer's products?

Short answer The manufacturer was the seller whether it shipped the premium itself or directed a supplier to ship it. California deliveries were taxable at one cent per point surrendered; qualifying out-of-state deliveries were treated as exempt interstate sales.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.0740
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1955-08-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A manufacturer operating a grocer-premium incentive program (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1955. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1955
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Aug. 31, 1955 associate-tax-counsel letter applies historical Rulings 55 and 71 to a proposed grocer incentive program. The PDF does not reproduce the Apr. 25 request, referral, program terms, point records, 60-item catalog, grocer orders, supplier agreements or invoices, warehouse records, shipping or delivery proof, resale certificates, tax payments, deductions, returns, or enclosed Ruling 71 copy. It prints 'your are selling'; CDTFA's current annotation renders the PDF's one-cent rate as '1H per point' and omits the resale directions. Another taxpayer should check current incentive-point, premium, valuation, shipment, interstate-commerce, sourcing, certificate, tax-paid-purchase, evidence, and sales-and-use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer awarded grocers points for selling its products. Grocers could surrender the points at one cent each for catalog merchandise supplied by four vendors, either through the manufacturer's warehouse or by direct shipment from a supplier.

The letter treated the manufacturer as seller to the grocer in both shipment structures. The selling price was the number of points surrendered, valued at one cent per point.

Under historical Ruling 55, the source treated deliveries to out-of-state grocers as exempt interstate-commerce transactions and California deliveries as taxable. Because the manufacturer was reselling the premiums, it could give suppliers resale certificates even for direct shipments and could claim the historical Ruling 71 deduction for tax-paid purchases resold.

Citations and references

  • Historical California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 55, section A-1-(c) — cited and characterized; ruling text not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Historical California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 71 — cited and characterized; copy identified as enclosed but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Controller's Apr. 25 request — facts and question recited; year, letter, attachments, and Long Beach referral record not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Nationwide grocers, sales-earned points, 60 catalog items valued $2–$500, one cent per point, four suppliers, direct and warehouse shipments, assumed grocer orders, California and out-of-state destinations, resale certificates, and tax-paid purchases — facts supplied or assumed; program terms, point records, catalog, orders, supplier agreements and invoices, shipping and delivery proof, certificates, tax payments, and deductions not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 280.0740's grocer points, catalog, manufacturer sale, supplier shipment, one-cent rate, and destination treatment — live page renders the rate as “1H per point,” omits the resale and tax-paid-purchase directions, and supplies no additional transaction record
  • Possible later premium delivery, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, deduction, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

280.0740

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
August 31, 1955

S--- F---, Inc
T--- I--California
Attention:

SR -- XX XXXXXX
Mr. R--- R. K--Controller

Gentlemen:
Your letter of April 25 addressed to our Long Beach office has been forwarded to this office for reply. You request our opinion concerning the application of tax to your “Grocer Premiums Incentive Program”. Grocers throughout the nation are given points for selling your products. They are also supplied with catalogs which list 60 items of merchandise with retail values ranging from $2.00 to $500.00 The grocer may acquire one of the premium items by surrendering the points he has earned at the rate of 1¢ per point. Premium merchandise is supplied by four suppliers. In some cases the supplier will ship direct to the grocer and in other cases he will ship to your warehouse from which you will make shipment to the grocer. We assume that the grocer sends his order for premium merchandise to you. It is our opinion that your are selling the merchandise to the grocer whether you make shipment yourself or direct a supplier to make shipment. It is our opinion that the selling price is the number of points surrendered by the grocer for the premium merchandise at the rate of 1¢ per point. As indicated in Section A-1-(c) of Ruling 55 your delivery to an out-of-state grocer is an exempt interstate commerce transaction. Deliveries to California grocers are, however, subject to tax and you must pay this tax measured by the selling price. Since you are regarded as selling the premium merchandise, you may issue a resale certificate to your supplier. A resale certificate should be furnished to the supplier even if he makes shipment directly to the grocer. If you have paid tax on purchases, you will be entitled to a deduction for tax-paid purchases resold as set out in Ruling 71, copy enclosed. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Associate Tax Counsel
BH:tj
cc:
Long Beach – Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1955. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace