How was tax measured when a retailer charged for a catalog and later credited that amount against the customer's first merchandise purchase?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1982. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An out-of-state publisher sold catalogs to California retailers. A retailer could give them away or charge customers and promise an equal credit against the first merchandise purchase.
California use tax applied when a retailer bought catalogs for free customer distribution. The retailer was consumer of the gifts.
When a customer paid for a catalog before buying merchandise, the catalog transfer was a taxable sale at that time. A later equal credit reduced the merchandise sales price.
When the catalog and merchandise were transferred in the same transaction, both items were sold under the cited premium rule. The source said the net result was the same.
What this means for you
Track the catalog charge and later merchandise credit as separate events when they occur at different times.
Common questions
Q: Was a free catalog taxable to the customer?
A: No customer sale occurred, but the retailer owed use tax as consumer.
Q: Did the later credit erase the earlier catalog sale?
A: No. It adjusted the later merchandise price.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051, 6201, 6202, and 6401
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1670(a) and 1670(d)
- Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 280.0020 — cited; underlying material not reproduced in the official PDF
- Counsel's March 2, 1982 letter to Gary J. Jugum presenting three questions — facts and questions recited; letter, attachments, and client records not reproduced in the official PDF
- Regulation 1670(d) copy — identified as enclosed but not reproduced in the official PDF
- Out-of-state publisher, nationwide vendor catalog, retailer publication-cost reimbursements, free distributions, customer catalog charges, and first-purchase deductions — facts supplied; publishing and vendor agreements, catalog, invoices, reimbursements, distribution records, customer terms, receipts, credits, and returns not reproduced in the official PDF
- Official Annotation 280.0373's charged-catalog and first-purchase-discount summary — annotation omits the letter's publisher-to-retailer and free-catalog questions and supplies no additional transaction or implementation record
- Possible later catalog distribution or sale, merchandise credit, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 280.0373
- Original supporting opinion: 280.0373 PDF
Original ruling text
280.0373
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6493
April 21, 1982
Mr. R--- M. C---, Esq.
--- and ---, Inc.
P.O. Box XXX
---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. C---:
This responds to your letter of March 2, 1982 to Mr. Gary J. Jugum, which asks for the application of tax in three aspects relating to the following facts: A [out of state] corporation, whose only place of business is in that state, will publish a catalog which advertises the merchandise of various vendors throughout the United States. The corporation will distribute the catalog to its clients – retailers throughout the United States – who will have for sale to their customers the merchandise described in the catalog. The retailers will reimburse the [out of state] corporation for the publication costs of the catalogs and will distribute the catalogs to customers of the retailers. Your questions are as follows: A. Will California impose any sales or use tax upon the California retailers by reason of their purchase of the catalogs? Answer: Sales tax does not apply to the sale by the out-of-state publisher to the California retailer. It is not a sale by a retailer in this state (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6051). Use tax does apply to the use or other consumption of property purchased for use in California (Section 6201). Purchase of the catalogs for distribution to customers without charge constitutes a taxable use.
R--- M. C---, Esq.
-2-
April 21, 1982
280.0373
B.
Is there any such tax imposed upon the transaction of a California retailer giving free such a catalog to a customer? Answer: A retailer who makes a gift of property to customers is the consumer of the property, and the tax applies with respect to the sale of the property to such persons (Regulation 1670(a)). Since the sales tax did not apply to the sale to the retailer, the use tax is applicable (Section 6401), payable by the retailer, unless he paid tax to the [out of state] corporation as a retailer under the conditions specified in Section 6202. (See BTLG 280.0020.) C. Is there any such tax if a charge is made by the retailer to its customers for the catalog, if an agreed deduction, in the amount of the charge, is made against the first purchase from the retailer by the purchaser of the catalog? Answer: This encompasses two situations: (1) a customer asks for a catalog, makes no purchase, and is charged for the catalog. A deduction is given at a later time if a purchase is made; (2) the customer receives the catalog at the same time as it makes a purchase, and receives the deduction. In (1) the transfer of the catalog for a consideration is a sale of tangible personal property. The charge for the catalog is included in the retailer’s gross receipts at the time of the transfer of the catalog. Later, when the customer purchases merchandise and is given a discount measured by the price he paid for the catalog, that discount will be considered to be an adjustment to the price of the merchandise and may be excluded from the sales price of the merchandise. In (2) two items are sold at the time of the transaction: the merchandise and the catalog. Tax applies as set forth in Regulation 1670(d), copy enclosed for your ready reference. Thus, the net result is the same in (1) and (2). If further information is required, please write the undersigned. Very truly yours,
M. H. Howard
Tax Counsel
MHH:ba
Enc.
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1982. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace