Did a donor owe California use tax on advertising gifts deposited in the mail outside California for in-state recipients?

Short answer No under the stated rule. Deposit in the mail constituted delivery and passed title at the out-of-state mailing point, so the donor did not make the taxable use in California.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.0360
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-07-18
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board staff asking about advertising material mailed into California

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 18, 1950 office memorandum states a historical title-passage rule for gifts mailed outside California to California donees. The PDF does not reproduce the July 6 inquiry, A. K. Marshall's research, any cited authority, or records identifying the donor, advertising material, acquisition, mailing dates and locations, recipients, postage, delivery, or title. It prints 'the deposit of a gift in the mails constitute delivery'; that source form is preserved. No later mailing, filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other outcome is supplied. Another taxpayer should check current gift-delivery, title-passage, carrier and mailing terms, advertising-material, donor-use, interstate-transaction, evidence, and California use-tax law.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Board staff researched when delivery and title passage occurred for an advertising gift sent through the mail.

The memorandum concluded that depositing a gift in the mail constituted delivery to the recipient and passed title at that time.

When the advertising material was mailed outside California to a California donee, title therefore passed at the out-of-state mailing point. Under that reasoning, the donor did not owe California use tax on the property.

Citations and references

  • The source memorandum cites no statute, regulation, or case by name.
  • July 6 memorandum — question referenced; year, author, copy, and attachments not supplied
  • A. K. Marshall's recent research — conclusion described; date, cited authority, analysis, and research record not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Advertising material deposited in out-of-state mail and addressed to California donees — stated fact pattern; donor identity, material, acquisition, mailing dates and locations, recipients, postage, delivery, and title documents not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 280.0360's out-of-state mailing, title-passage, and donor-use-tax conclusion — annotation supplies no additional inquiry, research authority, mailing, title, delivery, or implementation record
  • Possible later mailing, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

280.0360
Place:
Date:

To:

Mr. --- ---

From:

E. H. Stetson

Re:

Applicability of Use Tax to Advertising Material

Sacramento, California
July 18, 1950

In answer to your memo of July 6 we advise that recent research by Mr. A. K. Marshall, Associate Tax Counsel, indicates quite definitely that the deposit of a gift in the mails constitute delivery of the gift to the donee, title passing at that time. Accordingly, it is our position that where advertising material is placed in the mails at a point outside this State, addressed to donees in this State, that title passes at the out-of-state point and that, therefore, the donor is not liable for use tax with respect to such property.

EHS:ph

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace