When did section 6353 exempt propane placed in a tank at the customer's location and later delivered to the premises as vapor?

Short answer Only when the seller controlled the tank and expressly retained title and possession until the propane reached the customer's premises in vapor form through mains or pipes. Customer control generally made the liquid delivery taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 275.0175.500
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1997-02-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Robert Nunes, Chief of the Board's Annotations Project, memorandum recipient

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This February 6, 1997 supervising-tax-counsel memorandum directed deletion of five legacy annotations and supplied consolidated text, which the current annotation publishes. The PDF does not reproduce the legacy texts, caller record, recent internal discussions, actual contracts, leases, invoices, title documents, tank records, rent charges, billing, deliveries, termination credits, or customer transactions. It states a hypothetical contract- and control-dependent rule rather than deciding a documented taxpayer transaction and reports no later amendment, review, dispute, sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other outcome. Another taxpayer should check current propane form, title and possession, tank control, lease substance, rent recovery, pipeline delivery, billing, transaction evidence, and sales-and-use-tax law.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The memorandum consolidated several older propane annotations into one rule. Propane delivered first as liquid into a tank at the customer's location qualified for the section 6353 exemption only if the seller kept title and possession until the propane entered the customer's premises in vapor form through mains or pipes.

Two conditions were essential. The contract had to expressly retain title in the seller until gaseous delivery, and the seller had to control the tank. Seller control existed when the seller owned the tank without leasing it to the customer or a third party, or when the seller leased the tank from the customer.

If the customer owned the tank or leased it from the seller or someone else, the sale generally occurred when liquid propane entered the customer-controlled tank and was taxable. A seller's leaseback from the customer had to be bona fide; if the seller raised the propane price to recover tank rent, the memorandum said to disregard the lease and treat the liquid delivery as taxable despite contrary title language.

When the exemption conditions were otherwise met, prebilling for the delivered liquid amount—with a credit for propane remaining when the contract ended—did not destroy the exemption. Nor did converting liquid gallons to cubic feet for billing.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6353 (as cited)
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotations 275.0173, 275.0176, 275.0177, 275.0178, and 275.0179 (directed to be deleted and consolidated, as cited)
  • Unidentified caller's confusion about Annotation 275.0173 — call referenced without caller identity, date, question details, notes, or separate record in the official PDF
  • Recent internal discussions on propane title, possession, tank control, leases, and billing — discussions referenced without dates, participants, notes, analyses, or separate records in the official PDF
  • Propane contracts, explicit title-retention terms, tank ownership and control, customer or third-party leases, seller leasebacks, rent recovery, prebilling, termination credits, gallon-to-cubic-foot conversion, liquid delivery, vaporization, and pipeline delivery — hypothetical rule stated; no actual contracts, leases, invoices, title documents, tank records, billing, deliveries, or customer transactions reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 275.0175.500's publication of the directed consolidated text — current annotation demonstrates publication but supplies no legacy-annotation archive, actual transaction, implementation history, or further authority
  • Possible later amendment, contract or billing review, tank-control dispute, sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82

Memorandum

275.0175.500

February 6, 1997

To :

Mr. Robert Nunes
Chief, Annotations Project

Date:

From :

David H. Levine
Supervising Tax Counsel

Telephone: (916) 445-5550

Subject:

CalNet 485-5550

Propane Annotations

We recently received a call from someone who was confused about the meaning of Annotation 275.0173. The actual wording seems to indicate that as long as the seller owns the tank, the sale of the propane may be exempt, which could include situations where the seller owns the tank but leases it to the customer. Of course, the sale would NOT be exempt if the tank is leased to the customer because the tank would be in the control of the purchaser and the sale of the propane would therefore occur when it is placed in the tank in liquid form. Annotation 275.0176 is subject to the same loose-wording infirmity. Rather than try to reword these annotations, please delete both of them. I note that this is as good as a time as any to correct a problem we have in the area of propane annotations. We have multiple annotations on the same subject that cover the exact same circumstances with slightly different wording when we should have a single annotation. The multiple annotations simply cause confusion because it is not clear if they cover the same subject (if so, why include them) or if they cover different subjects. In many cases, when an interpretation is clarified or refined, it is often best to amend the existing annotation than to add a new one. This is also true when an interpretation covers a slightly different situation. In the present matter, in addition to the annotations to be deleted mentioned above, Annotations 275.0177, 275.0178, and 275.0179 all cover the exact same circumstances. They state the rule, and there are a couple minor variations. All these annotations should be deleted and combined into a single annotation that covers the subject. Therefore, please delete all the propane annotations cited herein and replace with the following: A sale of propane delivered to the customer through a tank at the customer’s location qualifies for the exemption provided by section 6353 only if the seller retains title to and possession of the propane until the propane is

Mr. Robert Nunes

-2-

February 6, 1997
275.0175.500

delivered in vapor form to the customer’s premises through mains or pipes. This occurs only where the seller controls the tank, as discussed below, and where the contract contains an explicit provision whereby the seller retains title to the propane until it is delivered into the customer’s premise in a gaseous form. When the sale satisfies these conditions, it is exempt from tax. Where a customer leases the tank from either the seller or some other person, or where the customer owns the tank (and does not lease it to the seller as discussed below), the sale of propane is subject to tax because the sale of the propane occurs upon delivery into the tank, while in liquid form. A seller controls the tank only where it owns the tank (and does not lease it to the customer or a third party) or it leases the tank from the customer. If the seller leases the tank from the customer, it must be a bona fide lease, and the seller cannot increase its charge for the propane to recover its cost of leasing the customer’s tank. If it does so, the “lease” will be disregarded and the sale will be regarded as having occurred no later than when the propane is placed in the tank in liquid form, regardless of any title provision in the contract to the contrary. If the sale satisfies the conditions for exemption discussed above, prebilling the customer for the amount of liquid propane delivered into the tank, with a credit upon termination of the contract for any propane remaining in the tank, will not affect that exemption, nor will calculating the charge for the propane by converting the amount of liquid gallons delivered into the tank to cubic feet for purposes of billing. I believe this includes all the variations covered in the existing annotations, and effectively incorporates into a single annotation our recent discussions on this subject. DHL/cmm cc:

Ms. Leila Khabbaz (MIC:40)
Mr. Ronald L. Dick (MIC:82)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace