Which bee-pollen, propolis, royal-jelly, and weight-loss products were exempt, and which were taxable?

Short answer Four products without supplement labeling were exempt; two labeled royal-jelly supplements and a powdered weight-loss system were taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.1370
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-09-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A distributor whose seven bee-pollen and royal-jelly product labels were reviewed (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The first page and official annotation date this letter September 28, 1964, while pages two and three print September 21; the source does not resolve the conflict, so this page uses the matching first-page and annotation date. The PDF references but does not reproduce the Sacramento District request, seven labels, Weight-Bee-Ter menu, complete product evidence, or Regulation 1602 enclosure. It prints 'freezed dried,' 'for the women,' and 'for the men'; those source forms are preserved. It reports no later sale, label or formulation change, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other outcome. The four exempt and three taxable conclusions are specific to these products' forms, labels, and weight-loss use. Current form, ingredients, labels, menus, documentation, weight-loss use, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board reviewed seven bee-related products and reached four exempt and three taxable results.

Whole Grain Bee Pollen, Kid-Bees Bee Pollen, Bee Pollen Tablets, and Bee Propolis were treated as unusual foods. Their labels did not describe them as food supplements or equivalent products, so they were exempt.

Royal Energizer for women and Royal Energizer for men were taxable. Both were capsules, and their labels called them energy-building food supplements.

Weight-Bee-Ter was also taxable. It was a powder mixed with water and designed for a weight-reduction program; three servings supplied 330 calories and 33 grams of protein per day.

The PDF's first page and annotation say September 28, 1964, while later page footers say September 21. The matching first-page date is used here.

Common questions

Did tablet or capsule form automatically make every bee product taxable?

No. Some tablet and capsule products were exempt because their labels did not call them supplements; label and purpose mattered.

Why were the Royal Energizer products taxable?

Their labels expressly described them as energy-building food supplements.

Why was Weight-Bee-Ter taxable?

It was a powdered product designed for weight reduction and reduced caloric intake.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6359 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1602 (including subdivisions (a)(5) and (a)(5)(A)-(B)) (as cited)
  • Sacramento District officer Clinton Ostrom's request for label review and an opinion — request referenced without a date and not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Seven distributor product labels supplied for review — labels referenced and quoted in part but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Weight-Bee-Ter menu stated as enclosed with the product label — menu referenced but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Seven reviewed products: Whole Grain Bee Pollen, Kid-Bees Bee Pollen, Bee Pollen Tablets, Bee Propolis, Royal Energizer for women, Royal Energizer for men, and Weight-Bee-Ter — forms, ingredients, directions, label claims, calories, protein, and outcomes described; complete labels, packages, formulations, nutrition data, menus, promotional materials, samples, tests, invoices, and sales records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1602 enclosure — stated as enclosed; enclosure copy not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later product sale, label or formulation change, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

245.1370

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916/445-5493

September 28, 1964

Dear Mr. [S]:
We have been requested by Mr. Clinton Ostrom of our Sacramento District office to review the labels from certain products distributed by [N] and to render an opinion regarding the application of tax to the sale of these items. Mr. Ostrom has requested that we write to you concerning our opinion in this matter. The various products which we considered and our conclusions concerning the application of tax are as follows. 1. Whole Grain Bee Pollen - the label directs the user to chew or add the product to fruit or cereal. 2. Kid-Bees Bee Pollen - The product label states that each tablet contains 250 mg of bee pollen. 3. Bee Pollen Tablets – The label states that each tablet contains 500 mg. of bee pollen and freeze dried orange. The user is directed to eat as many tablets as desired. 4. Bee Propolis – This product comes in capsule form. The label states that propolis is a natural resinous substance gathered by the bees from trees and used to seal cracks and holes in their hives. 5. Royal Energizer – Royal Jelly for the Lady – The label states that this item is sold in capsule form and that each capsule contains “pure Royal Jelly with its

Mr. [S]

-2-

September 21, 1964
245.1370

own natural vitamins, minerals and proteins.” Furthermore, the label states that the product is “an enriching food supplement,” and that the product is “an energybuilding food supplement for the women.” 6. Royal Energizer – For Men – The label from this product indicates that each capsule contains 75 mg powdered ginseng root, 25 mg. Royal Jelly, and 50 I.U. Vitamin E. The label further states that the product “is a combination of nutrients especially prepared as an energy-building food supplement for the men.” 7. Weight-Bee-Ter – All Natural Diet System – with activated bee pollen. The label states that this product “is an exclusive formula consisting of activated bee pollen and freezed dried orange juice containing naturally occurring vitamins, minerals, amino acids, enzymes, nucleic acids, flavonoids and lecithin.” Additionally, the label states that the product “was designed to be an effective and easy weight reduction program that can be used with each menu (enclosed),” and that the product can also “be used as a nutritional energizer separate from any diet plan.” The recommended dosage of three servings provides the user with 330 calories and 33 grams of protein per day. To make each serving, the user is directed to mix one level scoop of the powder with 8 oz. of cold water and stir well. California Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on the sale or use of tangible personal property in this state, unless such sale or use is otherwise exempt from taxation. As provided under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6359 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1602 (copy enclosed), tax does not apply to the sale or use of food products for human consumption. Regulation 1602(a)(5), which interprets and applies Section 6359, provides that tax does not apply to the sale of unusual foods such as brewer’s yeast, wheat germ and seaweed, except when their label states they are a food supplement or the equivalent. With regard to items 1 through 4 listed above, it is our opinion that these products fall within the category of unusual foods. Since these products are not described on their labels as food supplements or the equivalent, it is our opinion that these items qualify as exempt food products under Regulation 1602. Therefore, tax does not apply to the sale, use, or consumption of items 1 through 4 inclusive. With regard to items 5 through 7 listed above, the exemption from tax as a “food product” does not apply to the sale of preparations in liquid, powdered, granular, tablet, capsule, lozenge, or pill form sold as dietary supplements or adjuncts. (Section 6359, Regulation 1602(a)(5).) In our view, these items do not qualify as tax exempt “food products.” Items 5 and 6 are considered to be dietary supplements because they are sold in capsule form and are described on their labels to be a food supplement. Item 7 is a dietary supplement for the reason that it is sold in powdered form and is designed to decrease the user’s caloric intake as part of a weight loss

Mr. [S]

-3-

September 21, 1964
245.1370

program. (See Regulation 1602(a)(5)(A) & (B).) Consequently, the sale of the products described above as items 5 through 7 is subject to tax. Very truly yours,

Charles J. Graziano
Tax Counsel
CJG:ba
Enc. - Reg. 1602
cc:

Mr. Clinton Ostrom
Sacramento District Office

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace