Was aloe vera gel exempt when it was consumed as a beverage and not labeled as a dietary supplement?

Short answer Yes. The described aloe vera gel was exempt because it was used as a beverage and was not labeled as a dietary supplement.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.1119
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-08-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Internal Return Review inquiry concerning a taxpayer's aloe vera gel

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 21, 1989 internal memorandum describes but does not reproduce S. L. Shaver's June 16 request, the taxpayer's submission, formula specifications, label, package, sample, preservative evidence, beverage-use records, invoices, or sales records. The conclusion depends on the stated 99.55-percent aloe vera, 0.25-percent Irish moss, and 0.20-percent sorbic acid composition, beverage use, and absence of dietary-supplement labeling. The PDF reports no follow-up or later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency outcome. Current composition, intended use, complete labeling, documentation, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The reviewed product consisted of 99.55% aloe vera, 0.25% Irish moss, and 0.20% sorbic acid, which the memorandum identified as a food preservative.

The product was not labeled as a dietary supplement. According to the taxpayer, it was used as a beverage.

Under those conditions, Board counsel concluded that the aloe vera gel qualified as an exempt food product under Regulation 1602 and that tax did not apply to its sale.

Common questions

Did the source exempt every aloe vera gel?

No. It addressed the stated composition, beverage use, and absence of dietary-supplement labeling.

What ingredients did the reviewed product contain?

It was 99.55% aloe vera, 0.25% Irish moss, and 0.20% sorbic acid.

What product-use fact mattered?

The taxpayer said the gel was consumed as a beverage.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1602 (as cited)
  • Return Review staff member S. L. Shaver's June 16, 1989 memorandum requesting aloe-vera-gel advice — referenced; not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Referenced taxpayer's aloe vera gel consisting of 99.55 percent aloe vera, 0.25 percent Irish moss, and 0.20 percent sorbic acid, with beverage use and no dietary-supplement label — facts stated; taxpayer submission, formula specifications, label, package, sample, preservative evidence, beverage-use records, invoices, and sales records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum
To:

Ms. S. L. Shaver
Return Review

From:

Mary C. Armstrong
Legal

Subject:

Aloe Vera Gel

245.1119
Date:

August 21, 1989

This is in response to your memorandum of June 16, 1989 in which you asked our advice regarding the correct application of tax to aloe vera gel sold by the referenced taxpayer. In this case the aloe vera gel consists of 99.55% aloe vera, .25% Irish moss and .20% sorbic acid (a food preservative). It is not labeled as a dietary supplement. According to the taxpayer it is used as a beverage. As such, it qualifies as an exempt food product under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1602 and tax does not apply to the sale. If you have further questions concerning this matter, we will be happy to discuss them with you.

MCA:wak

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace