Was Stretch Island Fruit Leather taxable as candy, confectionery, or snack food under the California rules applied in 1991?

Short answer No. California treated the compressed dried-fruit product as nontaxable because it was neither candy or confectionery nor snack food.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.1075
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-09-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The seller of Stretch Island Fruit Leather (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This brief September 6, 1991 letter describes but does not reproduce the seller's August 30 request, product formula, ingredient specifications, labels, package, sample, tests, manufacturing records, invoices, or sales records. Its product-specific conclusion relies on Stretch Island Fruit Leather being compressed dried natural fruit made with fruit, fruit juices, and spices and without sugar, preservatives, artificial flavors, or artificial colors. The source identifies no numbered candy, confectionery, or snack-food authority and reports no follow-up or later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency outcome. Current formulation, labeling, product category rules, sales circumstances, documentation, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Stretch Island Fruit Leather was a compressed, dried natural-fruit product made from fruit, fruit juices, and spices.

The supplied product contained no sugar, preservatives, artificial flavors, or artificial colors.

Assistant Chief Counsel concluded that it was neither candy or confectionery nor snack food under the California law then applied. The product was therefore nontaxable.

Common questions

What ingredients did the source identify?

Fruit, fruit juices, and spices.

What did the source say was absent?

Sugar, preservatives, artificial flavors, and artificial colors.

Why was the product nontaxable?

The letter classified it as neither candy or confectionery nor snack food.

Citations and references

  • California law concerning candy or confectionery and snack food — applied without a statute, regulation, ruling, or case citation
  • Redacted seller's August 30, 1991 letter requesting confirmation of the California tax status of Stretch Island Fruit Leather — referenced; not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Stretch Island Fruit Leather as compressed dried natural fruit made with fruit, fruit juices, and spices and without sugar, preservatives, artificial flavors, or artificial colors — composition described; formula, ingredient specifications, labels, package, sample, tests, manufacturing records, invoices, and sales records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later product sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

245.1075

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-445-3723

September 6, 1991

[X]

Dear [X]:
This is in response to your letter of August 30, 1991.
We can confirm that your product, Stretch Island Fruit Leather, is not subject to California sales tax. Your product is a compressed, dried, natural fruit product. Ingredients include fruit, fruit juices, and spices. Your product does not contain sugar, preservatives, artificial flavors or colors. Your product is neither a “candy or confectionery” nor a “snack food” within the meaning of the California law. Your product is nontaxable. Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel
GJJ:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace