How did California split ice sales to street-food vendors who resold some ice in drinks and consumed the rest to keep products cold, without resale certificates?

Short answer Absent clearer evidence, the Board treated 50 percent as nontaxable resale in soft drinks and 50 percent as taxable ice consumed in the vendors' businesses.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 245.0590
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-06-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The Board's deputy director for sales and use tax, requesting an annotation after a Board decision involving hot-dog vendors

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 19, 1995 internal memorandum summarizes but does not formally identify or reproduce the recent Board decision or the deputy director's April 11 memorandum. It describes but does not supply the cart leases, invoices, resale certificates, vendor statements, soft-drink sales records, cooling-use records, audit workpapers, tax returns, allocation computations, underlying proof, annotation work record, or distributed copies. The 50/50 allocation applies only in lieu of clearer evidence on those facts, and the PDF reports no follow-up or later sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency outcome. Current transactions, uses, documentation, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer rented hot-dog carts to independent street vendors and also sold them ice without obtaining resale certificates.

The vendors used some ice in or with soft drinks sold to customers and used the rest to keep food and drinks cool while awaiting sale. The first use was resale; the second was consumption in the vendors' businesses.

Without clearer evidence supporting another split, the Board treated 50 percent of the ice sales as nontaxable sales for resale and 50 percent as taxable retail sales for business use.

Section 6359.7 did not exempt the taxable half. The memorandum said that exemption covered ice used by a carrier to pack or ship food products, not ice used by street vendors for cooling.

Common questions

Why was ice put in customer drinks nontaxable?

That ice was resold in or with the soft drinks.

Why was cooling ice taxable?

The vendors consumed it in operating their businesses rather than reselling it.

Was the 50/50 split mandatory in every case?

No. The memorandum used that split in the absence of clear evidence showing otherwise.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6359.7 (as cited)
  • Deputy Director Glenn A. Bystrom's April 11, 1995 memorandum concerning a recent Board decision — referenced; not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Recent Board decision allocating the taxpayer's ice sales 50 percent to resale and 50 percent to taxable business use — summarized but not formally identified or reproduced in the official PDF
  • Taxpayer's hot-dog-cart rentals and ice sales to independent street vendors — transactions and uses described; cart leases, invoices, resale certificates, vendor statements, soft-drink sales records, and cooling-use records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Absence of clear evidence supporting a different allocation — evidentiary condition stated; audit workpapers, tax returns, allocation computations, and underlying proof not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Instruction to Robert Nunes to create the annotation and copies to William D. Dunn, Dennis fox, Robert Nunes, and James Stillwell — directive and copy list stated; annotation work record, copies, and follow-up not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later sale, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum
To:

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom, Deputy Director
Sales and Use Tax Department

From:

David H. Levine
Supervising Staff Counsel

Subject:

Ice Annotation

245.0590
Date:

June 19, 1995

This is in response to your memorandum dated April 11, 1995 regarding a recent decision of the Board. In that case, the Board regarded a person who sold ice to hot dog vendors (who used carts rented from the taxpayer) as having sold 50 percent of the ice for resale in soft drinks and as having sold 50 percent at retail for use in keeping food and soft drinks cool while awaiting sale. We agreed that an annotation on the subject was appropriate. Therefore, by copy of this memorandum, I am asking Mr. Nunes to annotate the following: Sales of Ice. A taxpayer rents hot dog carts to independent street vendors, and also sells them ice without taking any resale certificates. The street vendors use some of the ice to keep their products cool or fresh, and resell some of the ice in or with soft drinks. In lieu of clear evidence otherwise, the Board will regard 50 percent of the sales of ice as nontaxable sales to the vendors for resale in or with soft drinks and 50 percent of the sales of ice as taxable retail sales for use in the vendor's business. The exemption provided by section 6359.7 does not apply to these taxable sales since that exemption applies only with respect to ice used in packing or shipping food products for human consumption by carrier and not for use of ice by street vendors.

DHL:cl
cc:

Mr. William D. Dunn
Mr. Dennis fox
Mr. Robert Nunes
Mr. James Stillwell

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace