Was federal excise tax on photographic apparatus included in California gross receipts and sales price?

Short answer Yes. California classified it as a manufacturer's excise tax and included the federal charge in the sales- or use-tax measure.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 235.0140
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-10-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A business asking about federal excise tax on photographic apparatus

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 24, 1950 opinion describes but does not reproduce the requester's October 17 letter, its $750 example computation, Ruling 57, the full federal provision, the unidentified 'various tax services,' review workpapers, or the contract, invoice, property, federal-tax, payment, and return records. The classification depended on those historical materials. The PDF supplies no later return treatment, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California classified the federal excise tax on photographic apparatus under historical Internal Revenue Code section 3406(a)(4) as a manufacturer's excise tax.

The federal charge was therefore included in gross receipts subject to sales tax or sales price subject to use tax. In the example submitted, California said the tax measure was $750.

Common questions

Was the federal photographic-apparatus tax excluded?

No.

Why was it included?

It was a manufacturer's excise tax.

What measure did the opinion use in its example?

$750.

Citations and references

  • Historical Internal Revenue Code § 3406(a)(4)
  • Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 57, second paragraph
  • Requester's October 17, 1950 letter, including a numerical example with a $750 tax measure — question, Ruling 57 reference, and result described; full letter and computation not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Unidentified "various tax services" reviewed to classify the photographic-apparatus charge — no publisher, title, edition, date, page, or quoted text supplied in the official PDF
  • Board review of Internal Revenue Code section 3406(a)(4), the tax services, and Ruling 57 — conclusion stated; review notes, workpapers, full federal text, tax-service materials, and Ruling 57 not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Photographic-apparatus sale or use transaction, federal tax, gross receipts or sales price, and $750 example — transaction and result referenced; underlying contract, invoice, property, tax computation, payment, and return records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later return treatment, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other outcome after the advice — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

235.0140

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

October 24, 1950
REDACTED TEXT
Gentlemen:
This is in answer to your letter of October 17 with respect to the application of the California sales and use tax to the amount of the federal excise tax on photographic apparatus, imposed by Section 3406 (a) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code. A review of Section 3406 (a) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code, and of the various tax services indicates that the federal excise tax on photographic apparatus is a manufacturer's excise tax, within the meaning of the second paragraph of Sales and Use Tax Ruling 57, referred to in your letter. Accordingly, the "gross receipts" or "sales price," as the case may be, subject to the sales or use tax, includes the amount of federal tax. In the example outlined in your letter the measure of the tax would be $750.00. Very truly yours, R. G. HAMLIN Associate Tax Counsel RGH:HB cc:

REDACTED TEXT

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace