Was the federal luxury tax effective in 1991 included in California gross receipts for covered sales and leases?

Short answer No. California treated the 10% federal charge as a retail excise tax and excluded it from gross receipts for covered title transfers and taxable leases.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 235.0105
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-12-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California Board of Equalization audit staff

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 6, 1990 memorandum does not identify the new federal luxury tax's title, public-law number, Internal Revenue Code section, enacted text, or price thresholds, and supplies no transaction, contract, invoice, lease, computation, or payment records. It prints '“gross receipt” do not include' and ends the section 6010 sentence without punctuation; those defects are preserved. No later amendment, repeal, guidance, return, audit, assessment, claim, appeal, or outcome is supplied. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Effective January 1, 1991, the federal government imposed a 10 percent retail excise tax on the first retail sale of vehicles, boats, aircraft, jewelry, and furs above specified price thresholds.

California excluded that federal retail tax from gross receipts. The exclusion applied whether the covered transaction transferred title or was a lease treated as a sale and purchase under California law.

Common questions

Was the 1991 federal luxury tax included in California gross receipts?

No.

Did the exclusion cover qualifying lease transactions?

Yes, when the lease was treated as a sale and purchase under the cited California provisions.

Does this historical opinion state current federal luxury-tax law?

No.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006, 6010, and 6012(c)(4)(A) and referenced subparagraph (B)
  • Unidentified new federal luxury retail-excise-tax law effective January 1, 1991 — 10 percent rate and covered property described; title, public-law number, Internal Revenue Code section, enacted text, and price thresholds not supplied in the official PDF
  • Possible covered vehicle, boat, aircraft, jewelry, fur, title-transfer, or lease transactions — transaction classes described; no contracts, invoices, lease records, tax computations, or payments supplied in the official PDF
  • Source-printed phrase "‘gross receipt’ do not include" and missing terminal punctuation after section 6010 — printed text preserved; not silently corrected
  • Possible later federal amendment or repeal, California guidance, return treatment, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other application after the memorandum — no follow-up or outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

235.0105

Memorandum
To:

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom

From:

Gary J. Jugum

Subject:

New Federal Excise Tax Law – Tax on Luxury Items

Date:

December 6, 1990

Effective January 1, 1991, the United States has imposed a new retail excise tax, on the first retail sale of vehicles, boats, aircraft, jewelry and furs, to the extent that the price for such goods exceeds certain specified amounts. The rate of tax is 10 percent. Under subdivision (c) (4) (A) of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6012, “gross receipt” do not include: “The amount of any tax (not including, however, any manufacturers’ or importers’ excise tax, except as provided in subparagraph (B)) imposed by the United States upon or with respect to retail sales whether imposed upon the retailer or the consumer.” The new tax is excludable from “gross receipts,” under the provision quoted above. The amount of any such tax is nontaxable under the Sales and Use Tax Law, whether imposed with respect to a sale involving a transfer of title or a lease transaction which is treated as a “sale” and “purchase” under Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006 and 6010 Any questions concerning this issue should be directed to Ms. Elizabeth Abreu GJJ:sr cc:

Business Taxes Attorneys

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace