Was federal coconut-oil excise tax paid directly by the importing manufacturer included in California use-tax measure?

Short answer No. The importer used the coconut oil in manufacturing and paid the federal tax directly, so California did not include it in use-tax measure.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 235.0100
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1954-03-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California Board of Equalization audit and sales-tax counsel staff

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1954. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1954
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This March 4, 1954 opinion describes but does not reproduce audit staff's March 1 letter, the complete historical federal provisions, or the purchase, import, customs, origin, inventory, production, sale, return, tax-computation, and payment records establishing the taxpayer's own use and direct federal payment. The historical per-pound rates are not current law. The PDF supplies no later return treatment, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The taxpayer imported coconut oil for use in its own manufacturing operations. Historical federal law imposed a per-pound tax whose taxable event was the oil's first use in the United States to manufacture or produce an article intended for sale, and the user paid that tax directly to the federal government.

California concluded that this directly paid federal excise tax was not included in the measure of California use tax.

Common questions

Who paid the federal coconut-oil tax?

The importer that used the oil in manufacturing.

Was that direct federal payment included in California use-tax measure?

No.

Did the opinion address tax reimbursed to a seller?

No. Its facts involved direct payment to the United States.

Citations and references

  • Historical Internal Revenue Code §§ 2470–2483
  • Audit staff's March 1, 1954 letter — taxpayer facts and question identified by the reply; full letter not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Taxpayer's coconut-oil imports, geographic origin, own manufacturing use, articles intended for sale, federal excise-tax computations, and direct payments to the United States — facts and historical rates described; underlying purchase, import, customs, origin, inventory, production, sale, return, computation, and payment records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Complete historical federal excise-tax provisions and rate materials — operative rule summarized; full texts and administrative materials not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Possible later use-tax return treatment, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other outcome after the advice — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

235.0100
March 4, 1954
San Jose – Auditing (RGS)
Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel (BH)
REDACTED TEXT
In reply to your letter of March 1, we advise that Sections 2470-2483 of the Internal Revenue Code impose a tax of 3 cents per pound on coconut oil coming from the Philippine Island, United States possessions or the Trust Territory of the Pacific and a tax of 5 cents per pound on coconut oil coming from other places. The taxable event is the first use of the oil in the United States in the manufacture or production of an article intended for sale. The tax must be paid by the user. The subject taxpayer imports coconut oil for use in its manufacturing operations. It pays the tax directly to the United States. It is our opinion that the tax paid to the United States is not included in the measure of the California use tax. Bill Holden BH:ja

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1954. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace