Could a seller deduct a book reserve for disputed federal amusement tax that had not been reported or paid?

Short answer No. The historical deduction covered federal amusement tax actually paid, not an unpaid contingent reserve while liability remained in litigation.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 235.0020
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1951-07-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A business petitioning for redetermination while disputing federal amusement tax

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1951
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 31, 1951 opinion describes but does not reproduce the petition, acknowledgment, California determination, hearing request, agency file, taxpayer books, reserve computations, federal returns and payment records, or the pleadings, evidence, and court record in the Collector litigation. The enclosed Ruling 57 and Waiver of Hearing are omitted. The PDF supplies no later payment, waiver, hearing, federal judgment or settlement, federal tax payment, California refund claim, or outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The seller placed a disputed federal amusement-tax amount in a contingent reserve but had not filed federal returns or paid the tax because liability was being litigated.

California said the historical deduction applied only to federal amusement tax actually paid to the federal government. A book reserve for an unpaid amount could not reduce gross receipts subject to California sales tax.

The opinion suggested paying the California determination and later filing a refund claim if the seller lost the federal litigation and was required to pay the federal tax.

Common questions

Was the contingent reserve deductible?

No.

What did the historical deduction require?

Actual payment of the federal amusement tax.

What if the taxpayer later had to pay the federal tax?

The source suggested a California refund claim after that payment.

Citations and references

  • Historical Internal Revenue Code § 1700(e)
  • Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 57
  • Taxpayer's petition for redetermination acknowledged June 16, 1951, Board determination, hearing request, and agency file review — procedural posture described; petition, acknowledgment, determination, hearing request, and file not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Taxpayer's books and contingent reserve, unfiled federal amusement-tax returns, unpaid federal tax, allocated gross receipts, and litigation with the Collector of Internal Revenue — facts described; underlying books, computations, returns, payment records, pleadings, evidence, and court record not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Enclosed copy of Sales and Use Tax Ruling 57 and enclosed Waiver of Hearing — identified as enclosed but omitted from the official PDF
  • Potential payment, waiver, Board hearing, federal judgment or settlement, federal tax payment, California refund claim, or other outcome after the advice — no follow-up or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

235.0020

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

July 31, 1951
REDACTED TEXT

Gentlemen:
Following the filing of a petition for redetermination of our determination against you which we acknowledged on June 16, we have reviewed our file for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the tax has been erroneously asserted. It appears that the measure of the tax includes an amount which you have set up in your books as a contingent reserve for the federal amusement tax. If further appears that you have not filed returns or paid the federal amusement tax and that your liability for that tax is now the subject of litigation. As indicated by Sales and Use Tax Ruling 57, copy enclosed, the amount of the tax imposed under Chapter 10, Section 1700(e) of the Internal Revenue Code upon persons receiving payments for "admission, refreshment, service, or merchandise, at any roof garden, cabaret, or other similar place furnishing a public performance for profit, by or for any patron or guest who is entitled to be present during any portion of such performance" may be deducted from gross receipts subject to the State sales tax. This deduction, however, may be taken only for the amount actually paid to the Federal Government. As you claim that the federal tax does not apply, and have not paid the same, it is our opinion that you may not take a deduction of any amount which you have merely set up as a contingent reserve. It is our suggestion, therefore, that you pay the amount of the tax which we have asserted against you measured by the gross receipts allocated to such a contingent reserve. You may then file a claim for refund of the tax in the event that you are unsuccessful in the current litigation with the Collector of Internal Revenue and are required to pay the federal tax. Unless we hear from you within the next thirty days we shall schedule the matter for a hearing before this Board, as you have requested. In the event that you decide to pay the determination please complete and return the enclosed Waiver of Hearing. Very truly yours,

RGH:ja

R. G. Hamlin,
Tax Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace