Did taking custom-knife orders at one California show create use-tax collection responsibility even when every knife shipped later from Montana?

Short answer Yes under the historical rule applied. Entering California once to solicit or take orders was enough, even if no property changed hands at the show and every knife shipped later.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 220.0270
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-02-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Sacramento District compliance staff asking about an out-of-state custom-knife seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This February 10, 1995 internal memorandum describes but does not reproduce Sacramento District Compliance's January 17 memorandum or the retailer, show, product, order, payment, manufacture, and shipping records. The Montana retailer's show and transactions were prospective. Annotation 220.0240 is identified as being or having been deleted, but its text and deletion record are omitted. The PDF supplies no later show, order, payment, shipment, registration, return, remittance, audit, or outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Montana retailer planned to attend one California show to solicit custom-knife orders. Customers might pay a deposit, pay in full, or be billed later; the retailer would return to Montana, make the knives, and ship them to buyers by mail.

California said the retailer was engaged in business under section 6203(b) because it entered the state for the purpose of soliciting orders. One visit per year was enough, and no tangible personal property had to change hands during the show.

The label on the event did not matter. The same conclusion applied to a trade show, craft show, or convention when the retailer came to solicit or take orders. By contrast, attending a training seminar without selling, delivering, installing, assembling, or taking orders would not by itself trigger section 6203(b).

Common questions

Did later shipment from Montana avoid the collection duty?

No.

Did the customer have to pay in full at the show?

No. The conclusion covered deposits, full payment, and later billing.

Would a non-selling training visit have the same result?

No, assuming the retailer was not otherwise engaged in business in California.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6007, 6051, 6201, 6203(b), and 6401
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1620
  • Sacramento District Compliance's January 17, 1995 memorandum — facts and questions described; full memorandum not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Montana retailer's planned single California show, custom-made knives, order solicitation, lack of property transfer at the show, down-payment, full-payment, or later-billing alternatives, Montana manufacture, and mail delivery — facts and plan described; underlying retailer, show, product, order, payment, manufacture, and shipping records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 220.0240 (July 25, 1958) — identified as being or having been deleted, but its text and deletion record are not supplied in the official PDF
  • Potential show attendance, orders, payments, knife manufacture, shipments, registration, collection, returns, remittances, audits, or other outcomes after the advice — no follow-up records or final outcomes supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division

220.0270

Memorandum
To:

Mr. Alan Giorgi
Sacramento District Compliance

Date:

February 10, 1995

From:

Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel

Telephone:

Subject:

Use Tax, Out-of-State Vendor

(916) 322-2976
CalNet 8-492-2976

This is in response to your memorandum dated January 17, 1995 regarding the application of use tax to certain activities of an out-of-state retailer of custom-made knives. You state that the Montana retailer plans to attend one show in California this year, in order to solicit orders for the knives. You explain that no tangible personal property will change hands at the show, and that at the time of each order, the retailer will either take a down payment or payment in full, or will bill the customer later. The retailer will then go back to Montana, make each knife, and send each knife to the buyer through the mail. As you know, retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) A retail sale is a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6007.) When sales tax does not apply, such as when sales take place outside of California, the use tax, measured by the sales price of the property sold, applies to the use of property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401, Reg. 1620.) Although the purchaser owes the use tax, a retailer engaged in business in this state is required to collect the use tax from the purchaser and pay it to this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203.) "Retailer engaged in business in this state" includes any retailer having any representative, agent, salesperson, canvasser, independent contractor, or solicitor operating in this state under the authority of the retailer or its subsidiary for the purpose of selling, delivering, installing, assembling, or the taking of orders for any tangible personal property. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203(b).) Since the Montana retailer will visit California for the purpose of soliciting orders for the knives, the retailer will be engaged in business in California under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6203(b). This is true even if the retailer visits California no more than once per year, and even if no tangible personal property changes hands while the retailer is in California.

Mr. Alan L. Giorgi

-2-

February 10, 1995
220.0270

You ask whether there are distinctions for tax purposes among trade shows, craft shows, and conventions. As long as the purpose of the retailer's visit is to solicit or take orders for tangible personal property, the retailer must collect the applicable use tax from all of its California purchasers and pay the tax to this state, regardless of whether the visit is to a trade show, craft show, or convention. On the other hand, if a retailer were to visit California in order to attend a training seminar and not in order to sell, deliver, install, assemble, or take orders for any tangible personal property, then as long as that retailer was not otherwise engaged in business in this state, that visit would not bring the retailer within section 6203(b). You have cited Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 220.0240 (7/25/58). That annotation is being (or has been) deleted. The discussion above represents our current interpretation of section 6203(b). If you have further questions, please feel free to write again.

KWC:cl

cc:

Out-of-State District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace