Did using a California toll-free answering service to take orders make an out-of-state retailer collect use tax?

Short answer Yes under the historical rule applied. The California service was the retailer's order-taking representative; a 1997 source note extended collection to all taxable California sales, not just toll-free orders.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 220.0260
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1997-04-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A California WATS-line answering service asking about orders handled for its retail clients

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This source combines a January 30, 1981 staff letter with a parenthetical April 24, 1997 source note and therefore uses the later date. The letter describes but does not reproduce the president's December 29 request or the service, client, advertising, order, sale, delivery, and shipping records. It assumes the 800-number facilities and operators were in California. Regulation 1683 is identified as enclosed but omitted, and the PDF supplies no underlying 1997 review or memorandum. It also supplies no later registration, return, collection, payment, audit, or transaction outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A California answering service supplied toll-free numbers that retailers advertised nationally. Its California operators took telephone orders for clients.

California said an out-of-state retailer using that service had a representative operating in the state under its authority for taking orders. Section 6203(b) therefore made the retailer engaged in business, requiring registration and use-tax collection on taxable sales to California purchasers.

The original 1981 letter distinguished destinations and shipment paths. An entirely out-of-state sale remained outside California tax even though the order passed through the California number. A California retailer's contract-required shipment to an out-of-state destination could also avoid tax when shipped through the retailer's facilities or a carrier, customs broker, or forwarding agent. California delivery from a California retailer was subject to sales tax, while California delivery from an out-of-state retailer was subject to use tax under the stated analysis.

An April 24, 1997 note added that once the out-of-state retailer was engaged in business, collection covered its taxable California sales through all channels, including wholly mail-order sales, not just orders placed through the toll-free service.

Common questions

Did the California service have to own the merchandise?

No. Its order-taking role supplied the agency relationship.

Did the rule cover only orders placed through the toll-free number?

No. The incorporated 1997 note extended the duty to all taxable California sales while the retailer was engaged in business.

Was an out-of-state-to-out-of-state sale taxed solely because the order passed through California?

No.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6203(a)–(b)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1683
  • Answering service president's December 29, 1980 request letter — request and questions described; full letter not reproduced in the official PDF
  • R--- T--- Systems, Inc.'s California WATS-line facilities and operators, nationally advertised 800 numbers, order-taking service, retail clients, one client's unspecified transactions, purchaser and retailer locations, delivery destinations, shipment origins, and shipping methods — facts, questions, and assumptions described; underlying service, client, advertisement, order, sale, delivery, and shipping records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Assumption that the 800-number facilities and operators were located in California
  • Enclosed copy of California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1683 — identified as enclosed but omitted from the official PDF
  • DHL's April 24, 1997 parenthetical source note extending an engaged retailer's duty to sales through other means such as mail order — note printed; underlying review or memorandum not supplied in the official PDF
  • Possible client registration, collection, reporting, payment, audit, or transaction outcomes after the advice — no follow-up records or final outcomes supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

220.0260

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
916/ 445-3237

January 30, 1981

Ms. R--- B---, President
R--- T--- Systems, Inc.
XXXX --- Blvd.
--- ---, CA XXXXX

No Permit

Dear Ms. B---:
This is in response to your letter of December 29, 1980 in which you requested clarification as to the correct application of tax to orders placed through your company’s WATS line answering service. We understand that your clients advertise your “800” numbers on television, radio, magazines, etc. in every state in the nation for the purpose of taking orders by telephone. One of your clients wishes to know the correct application of the California sales and use tax in the situations described below. Before answering your questions specifically, we will first make some general statements concerning the correct application of tax in this area. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6203 requires all retailers who are engaged in business in this state and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to collect the tax from the purchaser and pay it to the board. A “retailer engaged in business in this state” is defined in Section 6203 as: “(a) Any retailer maintaining, occupying or using permanently or temporarily, directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, or agent, by whatever name called, an office, place of distribution, sales or sample room, or place, warehouse or storage place or other place of business in this state. “(b) Any retailer having any representative, agent, salesman, canvasser or solicitor operating in this state, under the authority of the retailer or its subsidiary

R--- T--- Systems, Inc.

-2-

Janaury 30, 1981
220.0260

for the purpose of selling, delivering or taking of orders for any tangible personal property.” For purposes of analysis, we will assume that your “800” number facilities and operators are located in California. An out-of-state retailer who utilizes your “800” telephone service for the purpose of taking orders will be considered to be a “retailer engaged in business in this state” since you will be considered a representative operating in this state under the authority of the retailer for the purpose of taking orders as provided in Section 6203(b). Accordingly, out-of-state retailers who utilize your “800” telephone service will be required to register with this Board and collect and report use tax on sales of tangible personal property to purchasers in California. Retailers who are already doing business in California will be required to report and pay either sales or use tax whenever a sale is made to a California purchaser for delivery in this state. If delivery is from within California to an out-of-state location, tax will not apply provided the property is shipped to the out-of-state location by facilities operated by the retailer or by delivery to a carrier, customs broker or forwarding agent, for shipment to such out-of-state locations. Your specific questions, and our answers follow. First, you wish to know whether California tax is applicable on orders received from callers from out of the state of California for delivery to out of state locations? If the purchaser is located out of state, the retailer is located out of state, and the property purchased is sent from the location of the out-of-state retailer to an out-of-state location, neither sales nor use tax will apply to the sale even though the order is placed through an “800” number located in California. If the retailer is located in California and the property purchased is shipped directly to the out-of-state purchaser by either facilities operated by the retailer or delivery by the retailer to a carrier, customs broker or forwarding agent, tax will not apply to the sale. This would be true whether or not the order was placed by an in-state or out-of-state purchaser. Secondly, you wish to know whether the California tax is applicable on orders received through an “800” number from callers within California for delivery to California locations? Sales tax will apply if the in-state order is placed through the “800” number with a retailer located within California and the property is shipped from within California, since the sale occurs within California and delivery to the purchaser is in California. If the retailer is located out-of-state and the property is sent from an out-of-state location, use tax will apply since, as stated above, the retailer will be considered to be “engaged in business in this state” by virtue of the fact that it has a representative in this state for the purpose of taking

R--- T--- Systems, Inc.

-3-

Janaury 30, 1981
220.0260

orders as provided in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6203 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1683 (copy enclosed). As such, the out-of-state retailer is required to collect and report use tax on its taxable sales of tangible personal property in California. (Whether they are through the 800 number or through other means, such as wholly by mail order since the retailer engaged in business in Cal is engaged here for all sales and use tax purposes. DHL 4/24/97.) Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Staff Counsel

MCA:ba
Enc.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace