Did storing and selling truck tires from a California public warehouse require a seller's permit and sales-tax reporting?

Short answer Storage alone was not a sale. Selling warehouse inventory required a permit unless every sale was exclusively interstate or foreign commerce; California delivery was taxable unless another exemption applied.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 220.0194
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1980-10-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A CPA for a seller considering storing truck tires in a California public warehouse

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1980. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1980
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 28, 1980 staff letter answers a CPA's September 25 request, which the official PDF does not reproduce, through five hypothetical questions about contemplated tire storage and sales. It supplies no client identity or underlying warehouse, inventory, direct-mail, customer, sale, carrier, shipment, delivery, or resale records. The many attached or enclosed statutes and regulations are not reproduced. Certificate C, resale certificates, and interstate-shipment documentation are prescribed but no completed records are supplied, and the PDF gives no later permit application, return, remittance, audit, or final outcome. Current law and complete records control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A seller considered storing truck tires in a California public warehouse and selling them by direct mail to trucking companies and distributors.

California said storage alone was not a sale because no title or possession transferred. Once California warehouse inventory was sold, the seller generally needed a permit unless every sale was exclusively in interstate or foreign commerce.

Contract-required shipment outside California by the seller's trucks or a common or contract carrier was not subject to sales tax when properly documented. Delivery to the purchaser or its representative in California was taxable. Mere storage before later transportation and use solely outside California was excluded from taxable storage or use under the cited regulation.

There was no tire-specific exemption, but qualifying common-carrier purchases could use the section 6385 exemption and prescribed certificate. Sales to distributors were nontaxable resales when supported by resale certificates.

Common questions

Did merely putting tires in the warehouse trigger sales tax?

No.

Did sales from the California inventory require a permit?

Generally yes, unless all sales were exclusively interstate or foreign commerce under the stated rule.

Were all sales to interstate trucking companies exempt?

No automatic tire exemption applied; the statutory common-carrier conditions had to be met.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006, 6051, 6066, 6072, and 6385
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1620(a)(3) and (b)(5), 1621, 1628, and 1699
  • California Civil Code section 1656.1
  • CPA's September 25, 1980 request received through Board Chairman Richard Nevins's office — request letter not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Five hypothetical questions about contemplated tire storage and sales, direct-mail activity, California and out-of-state customers, common carriers, distributors, shipment, delivery, and resale — underlying client, warehouse, inventory, advertising, customer, sale, carrier, shipment, delivery, and resale records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Attached or enclosed copies of Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006, 6051, 6066, 6072, and 6385; Civil Code section 1656.1; and Regulations 1620, 1621, 1628, and 1699 — enclosures not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Common-carrier Certificate C, resale certificates, and interstate-shipment documentation — records prescribed or discussed; no completed certificates or shipping proof supplied in the official PDF
  • Potential seller's permit, tax collection, reporting, and audit after the opinion — no application, return, remittance, audit, or final outcome supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

220.0194

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

GEORGE R. REILLY
First District, San Francisco

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 1799, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808)

ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR
Second District, San Diego

(916) 445-6493

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
Third District, San Rafael
RICHARD NEVINS
Fourth District, Pasadena
KENNETH CORY
Controller, Sacramento

October 28, 1980

DOUGLAS D. BELL
Executive Secretary

Mr. J--- A. F---, CPA
J--- A M--- & Company
XXX --- --- Avenue
--- ---, N.J. XXXXX

Dear Mr. F---:
Re:

Sales of Truck Tires

This is in response to your letter of September 25, 1980, received via the office of Mr. Richard Nevins, Board Chairman. Your client/taxpayer is or is contemplating storing truck tires in a public warehouse in California. Sales of the tires will be made principally to small trucking companies who are common carriers engaged in interstate commerce; other sales will be made to distributors who will resell the tires to the trucking companies. Sales will be made via direct mail advertising to California customers as well as out-of-state customers. You wish to know whether your client is subject to collecting a sales tax from such sales, and ask five hypothetical questions enumerated below. The answer follows each question. “1. Based on the storage of tires in a public warehouse in your state, is the taxpayer required to register as a vendor and collect and report sales and sales tax?” (a) If the sole activity of the taxpayer in relation to the tires is the storage of them in a public warehouse, there is no transfer of title or possession, hence no sale, and sales tax would not apply. See definition of “sale” in attached copy of Section 6006, California Revenue and Taxation Code (all sections cited refer to such code).

Mr. J--- A. F---

-2-

October 28, 1980
220.0194

(b) If tires located in the public warehouse are sold, the client would be required to obtain a seller’s permit, and the provisions of Sections 6066 and 6072 would apply (copy enclosed) unless all sales were exclusively in interstate or foreign commerce. See Regulation 1699, enclosed. (c) Whether the client may add sales tax reimbursement to the sales price of property sold at retail depends upon the agreement of sale, as provided in Civil Code Section 1656.1 (copy enclosed). (d) Sales tax is imposed for the reason, in the manner, and at the rate specified in Section 6051 (copy enclosed). (e) The mere storage of tangible personal property in a warehouse for the purpose of subsequently transporting it outside California for use thereafter solely outside California is excluded from the definition of “storage” and “use” and use tax does not apply. See Regulation 1620(b)(5), copy enclosed. “2. Based on the use of only direct mail catalogs and circulars and no warehouse located in your state, is the taxpayer required to register as a vendor and collect and report sales and sales tax even though all tires shipped into your state are via common carriers?” If there is no nexus between the taxpayer and the State of California other than direct mail, the answer is no. No nexus means not only no warehouse, but no office or salesmen, representatives, peddlers, canvassers, agents of dealers, distributors, supervisors, employees, order takers, order mailers, or similar persons or facilities operating within California. “3. Does your sales use tax law provide an exemption for the sale of truck tires to a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce?” There is no specific exemption for truck tires per se. There is, however, an exemption for sales of tangible personal property to a common carrier subject to the conditions set forth in Section 6385 (copy enclosed). Such exemption would apply to sales of truck tires, under the prescribed conditions. “4. If there is an exemption, what is the proper exemption form that the customer must furnish the taxpayer? Please furnish us with a copy of such form.” Regulation 1621 (copy enclosed) implements and makes specific Section 6385, the exemption for sales to common carriers. The contents of the form to be used in claiming the exemption of Section 6385(a) is Certificate C, set forth in the regulation. It is the responsibility of the taxpayer to prepare the form; the Board does not supply it.

Mr. J--- A. F---

-3-

October 28, 1980
220.0194

“5.
Does your sales and use tax law require the reporting of sales and collection of tax for shipment of tires to destinations outside your state from a public warehouse located in your state?” Use tax does not apply if your client retains ownership of the tires and merely ships them to destinations outside California. If the shipment to the destination outside California is pursuant to a sale of the tires, the sales tax will not apply provided the shipment is by your client’s trucks or a common or contract carrier. Documentation of the interstate shipment must be retained for audit purposes. Sales tax will apply if the tires are delivered to the purchaser or his representative in California. See Regulation 1620(a)(3), copy enclosed. Shipment to a distributor who will resell the tires is a nontaxable sale for resale if a resale certificate is obtained from the distributor and retained (Regulation 1628, copy enclosed). If any additional information is required, please write the undersigned. Very truly yours,

Margaret H. Howard
Tax Counsel

MHH:ba
Enc.
cc:
Mr. Richard Nevins
Mr. Douglas D. Bell
Mr. D. J. Hennessy

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1980. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace