Was a later sale of bottled-water pallets taxable when the customer decided to keep them for internal store transport?

Short answer Yes. The customer bought the pallets for its own internal use, and the water seller had already used them as returnable containers before the later sale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.1590
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-12-16
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board principal tax auditor Glenn A. Bystrom

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 16, 1992 internal memorandum responds to Principal Tax Auditor Glenn A. Bystrom's June 18 memorandum, captioned as a District AP Inquiry; the request and any underlying district material are described but not reproduced in the official PDF. It concerns bottled water delivered on pallets for which the seller retained title and paid acquisition tax, followed by the customer's separate decision to keep the pallets for internal store transport. Timing, title, prior filling and use, customer purpose, separate invoicing, later authority, and current law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A bottled-water seller normally retained title to its pallets, treated them as returnable containers, and paid tax when buying them. A reseller customer later decided to keep pallets that had arrived with water and use them to move merchandise among its own stores. The seller then separately invoiced the customer for the pallets.

California treated that later agreement as a taxable retail sale. The customer acquired the pallets for internal business use, not to ship goods to other buyers under a container exemption.

The seller also could not claim a tax-paid-purchases-resold deduction for new pallets. It had already used them by filling them as returnable containers before selling them to the customer.

Common questions

Was the original water delivery taxable as a pallet sale?

No. The memorandum says the returnable pallets had already been properly taxed to the bottled-water seller.

Why was the later transaction taxable?

The customer bought the pallets for its own internal transport after delivery.

Could the seller recover its acquisition tax through a resale deduction?

No. It had used the pallets before the later sale.

Citations and references

  • Regulation 1589(b)(1)(C) — returnable-container treatment and sale-with-contents rule discussed
  • Regulation 1667 — cited by the customer in disputing the tax
  • Regulation 1630 — noted as inapplicable where the shipper is the seller of the contents
  • Principal Tax Auditor Glenn A. Bystrom's June 18, 1992 memorandum, captioned as a District AP Inquiry — transaction facts and taxability question described; separate memorandum and any underlying district material not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division

Memorandum
To

:

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom
Principal Tax Auditor

From :

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel

Subject:

District AP Inquiry - Sales of Pallets

195.1590
Date:

December 16, 1992

This is in response to your memorandum of June 18, 1992 inquiring about the taxability of the sale of pallets by A--- W--- Corporation ("A---") to R--- G--- Company ("R--- "). We understand that A--- is a producer and distributor of bottled water. A--- always ships its products to customers on pallets. A--- makes no charge for the pallets and retains title to same. A--- considers the pallets to be returnable containers and pays tax to their suppliers on the purchase price of the pallets. All pallets are generally returned by the customers to A---; however, if a customer should want to keep the pallets, a specific charge is made and invoiced separately from the bottled water. R--- G--- Company purchased a large quantity of bottled water from A--- for resale. The product was delivered on both new and used pallets. R--- informed A--- that they wanted to keep the pallets for the purpose of transporting merchandise among their various stores. A--- invoiced R--- for the pallets and added "sales tax." R--- refused to pay the "sales tax," citing Regulations 1589 and 1667. It is our opinion that tax applies to the sales in question. It is true that Regulation 1589, "Containers and Labels" provides in paragraph (b)(1)(C) that tax does not apply to sales of "All containers when sold with the contents, if the sales price of the contents is not required to be included in the measure of the sales tax or the use tax."

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom

-2-

December 16, 1992
195.1590

It is also true that we have (perhaps wrongly) interpreted this section to apply in the resale context. That is, where a nonreturnable container is used as a shipping device to move goods from a manufacturer to a wholesaler, we permit the manufacturer to acquire the container for resale, and we tax no portion of the charge made by the manufacturer to the wholesaler as a charge made for the container. The manufacturer can fill the container without incurring a use tax, and the wholesaler can discard the container (as "waste") without incurring a use tax. (Note that Regulation 1630 does not apply in cases of this type, where the shipper is the seller of the contents.) In the case in question, the original transaction between A--- and R--- was not subject to tax in whole or in part. The containers were "returnable containers," and were properly taxed to A---. Subsequent to the original delivery, while the containers were with R---, R--- agreed to make a payment for the containers, and A--- agreed that R--- need not return the containers but could keep them. This was a sale transaction. This was a retail transaction, because R--acquired the containers for its own use in transporting merchandise amongst its various stores. There is no exemption which is applicable to this sale transaction. The statutory exemption for containers is necessary because filling a container is a use. Containers may be sold tax free to persons who fill the containers and sell the containers with their contents, with the understanding that the containers are not to be returned. Containers may be sold tax free to persons who fill the containers and sell the containers with their contents, in the circumstance where the containers will be returned to the persons who fill the containers. There is no exemption for sales of containers to persons who use the containers, not for shipping goods to others, but for internal purposes. Additionally, A--- is not entitled to a tax-paid purchases resold deduction on new pallets purchased tax-paid and sold under the described circumstances. A--- used the pallets by filling the pallets prior to the time the pallets were sold to R---. The pallets were purchased as returnable contents and were used as returnable containers. The pallets were purchased as returnable containers and were taxable as such.

GJJ:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace