Were empty pallets sold to trucking companies to replace loaded pallets taken from customers taxable in California?

Short answer Yes. California classified the replacement pallets as returnable containers, and a Washington exemption certificate did not change the California result.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.1562
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-05-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted pallet seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 10, 1996 opinion concerns empty pallets bought by trucking companies to replace loaded pallets taken from customers. The March 8 request and its enclosed Washington exemption certificate are described but not reproduced in the official PDF; the response's enclosed Regulation 1589 copy is also unpublished. California use, pallet function, transaction facts, certificate jurisdiction, later authority, and current law control. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A pallet seller asked whether trucking companies owed tax when they bought empty pallets to replace loaded pallets taken from their customers.

California classified the replacement pallets as returnable containers. The seller's sales of those pallets to the trucking companies were taxable.

One trucking company supplied an exemption certificate prepared under Washington's retail sales tax law. California said that certificate was irrelevant to the transaction's treatment under California sales and use tax law.

Common questions

Why were the pallets taxable?

They were empty replacement pallets used as returnable containers by the trucking companies.

Did the Washington certificate protect the California sale?

No.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051 — general retail-sales tax rule stated
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6007 — retail sale defined as a sale other than resale in the regular course of business
  • Cal. Civ. Code § 1656.1 — contractual collection of sales-tax reimbursement referenced
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6364 and Regulation 1589 — pallet and returnable-container treatment applied; the regulation copy listed as enclosed with the response is not included in the official PDF
  • Requester's March 8, 1996 letter — tax question and Washington exemption certificate described; separate letter not reproduced in the official PDF
  • G--- T---, Inc. Washington Retail Sales Tax Law exemption certificate — described as enclosed with the request; certificate not included in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
195.1562
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
JOHAN KLEHS
LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
First District, Hayward
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
DEAN ANDAL
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082) Second District, Stockton Telephone: (916) 324-2614
FAX: (916) 323-3387
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego

BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles

KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
May 10, 1996
────────

E. L. Sorensen, Jr.
Executive Director

Ms. G--- S---
P--- P--- E---
XXXX --- --- Way
--- ---, CA XXXXX

Re: P--- P--- E---
Account No. SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. S---:

This is in response to your letter dated March 8, 1996, regarding the application of sales tax to your sales of pallets to trucking companies. You ask “whether trucking companies purchasing empty pallets to replace the loaded ones taken from their customers are liable for sales tax on the pallets.”

With your letter, you have enclosed a copy of an exemption certificate which appears to be executed by G--- T---, Inc. pursuant to the Washington Retail Sales Tax Law. You ask whether that exemption certificate exempts G--- T---, Inc. from its tax liability, if any, under the California Sales and Use Tax Law.

DISCUSSION

Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) A retail sale is a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. (Rev. & Tax.
Code § 6007.) Sales tax is imposed upon the retailer, but the retailer may collect sales tax reimbursement from the purchaser if the contract of sale so provides. (Civ. Code § 1656.1.)

The exemption relevant to the transaction at issue is provided by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6364, which exempts sales of containers under specific conditions. This statute is interpreted in Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1589 (copy enclosed) which provides that the term "container" includes articles on which tangible personal property is placed for shipment, and specifically includes pallets. Pallets may be classified as either returnable or nonreturnable


Page 2

Ms. G--- S--- -2- May 10, 1996
195.1562

containers, depending on how the pallets are used. Subdivision (a) of Regulation 1589 defines the term "returnable containers" as containers of a kind customarily returned or resold by the buyers of the contents for re-use by the packers, bottlers, or sellers of the commodities contained therein. All other containers are "nonreturnable containers."

The empty pallets purchased by the trucking companies to replace loaded ones taken from their customers constitute returnable containers. Your sales of the pallets to the trucking companies for such use are subject to tax. (Reg. 1589(b)(1).)

We note that the exemption certificate G--- T---, Inc. provided to you was apparently executed pursuant to the Washington Retail Sales Tax Law and is irrelevant as to the proper application of tax under the California Sales and Use Tax Law.

If you have further questions, please feel free to write again.

Sincerely,

Sophia H. Chung
Staff Counsel

SHC:rz
Enclosure

cc: Sacramento District Administrator (KH)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace