Were nonreturnable materials exempt when a contract packer packaged a client's lottery tickets for the client's later sales?

Short answer Yes. Ownership of the tickets did not matter; assuming the materials were nonreturnable containers, the packer placed goods in them for subsequent sale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.0706
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-03-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board Audit Evaluation and Planning supervisor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This March 26, 1996 internal memorandum assumes the purchased materials were nonreturnable containers and that the client's packaged lottery tickets were later sold. The February 8 request is quoted or summarized but not separately reproduced. It discusses Regulations 1589 and 1630 while amendments were still proposed, but the amendment dates and rulemaking records are not supplied in the official PDF. The memorandum says the food-product language was not intended to reverse broader prior interpretations. Current law controls.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A contract packer bought packaging materials, placed a client's lottery tickets into the packages, returned the packaged tickets to the client, and the client shipped them to customers.

Assuming the materials were nonreturnable containers, California treated their sale to the packer as exempt. The packer did not have to own the goods; it was enough that it placed tangible personal property in the containers for subsequent sale.

The memorandum also explained that proposed amendments mentioning food products were meant to clarify, not reverse, prior interpretations covering other tangible personal property.

Common questions

Did the packer need to own the lottery tickets?

No.

Did proposed food-container language exclude packaging for other products?

No according to the memorandum's explanation of the amendments' purpose.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6051, 6201, and 6401 — general sales- and use-tax rules stated in the memorandum
  • Regulations 1589 and 1630 — proposed container and commercial-packer amendments discussed; amendment dates and rulemaking records not supplied in the official PDF
  • Annotations 195.0060, 195.0330, and 195.1260 — prior nonreturnable-container interpretations cited
  • Requester's February 8, 1996 memorandum to Acting Chief Counsel Gary J. Jugum — lottery-ticket packaging facts and legal-opinion request quoted or summarized; separate memorandum not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division

Memorandum

195.0706

To

:

Mr. J. W. Cornelius, Supervisor
Audit Evaluation and Planning - MIC: 40

From

:

Sophia H. Chung
Staff Counsel

Subject :

Date:

March 26, 1996

S--- P---

Your memorandum dated February 8, 1996, to Mr. Gary J. Jugum, Acting Chief Counsel, has been referred to me for response. You request a legal opinion regarding the application of tax to the sale of certain P--- materials to S--- P---. You provide the following factual background: “S--- P--- packages lottery tickets for their customer, S--- G---. S--- G--- prints lottery tickets for sale to several states, including California. The packaged lottery tickets are then returned to S--- G--- who ships the packaged tickets to their customers.” DISCUSSION Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless the sale is exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) When sales tax does not apply, use tax, measured by the sales price, applies to the use of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for the storage, use, or other consumption of that property in California, unless the use is exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code
§§ 6201, 6401.)
Tax does not apply to sales of nonreturnable containers sold without the contents to persons who place tangible personal property in the containers for subsequent sale, regardless of whether such persons are the owners of the tangible personal property placed in the containers. (BTLG Annots. 195.0060 (9/13/53, 8/1/63); 195.0330 (4/19/89); 195.1260 (4/1/53).) Accordingly, assuming that the packaging materials purchased by S--- P--- are nonreturnable containers, the sale of such nonreturnable containers to S--- P--- who places lottery tickets in the containers for subsequent sale by S--- G--- is not subject to tax.

Mr. J. W. Cornelius

2

March 26,1996
195.0706

As you have noted, Regulation 1589 is currently in the process of being amended to provide that tax does not apply to sales of nonreturnable containers when sold without the contents to persons who place food products for human consumption in the containers for subsequent sale. Regulation 1630 is also in the process of being amended to provide that tax does not apply to sales of nonreturnable containers sold without the contents to packers who place food products for human consumption in the containers for subsequent sale. The proposed amendments to Regulations 1589 and 1630 are consistent with the interpretations made by this agency in certain specific transactions identified previously where it was determined that tax does not apply to sales of nonreturnable containers to persons who place tangible personal property in the containers for subsequent sale. These proposed amendments are intended to clarify the application of tax and are not intended to reverse any interpretations previously made by this agency. Therefore, although the proposed amendments specifically address persons or packers who place food products, there is no distinction as to the application of tax between sales of nonreturnable containers to persons or packers who place food products for human consumption in containers for subsequent sale from sales of nonreturnable containers to persons or packers who place other tangible personal property in containers for subsequent sale. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (916) 324-2614. SHC:rz cc:

Mr. Gary J. Jugum
Mr. Ronald L. Dick
Mr. David H. Levine

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace