Were cardboard and printing taxable when printed cards were stapled to bagged food and sold with the product?

Short answer No. The printed cardboard was an exempt nonreturnable container, so both the cardboard and printing could be bought for resale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.0180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1956-03-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted food-products seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1956. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1956
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This March 21, 1956 opinion assumes the printing labeled the commodities rather than advertising the company, the cardboard was stapled to cellophane-bagged food, and it was transferred without return. The requester's March 12 letter and the enclosed copies of Rulings 49 and 68 are not reproduced in the official PDF; the opinion supplies the facts and identifies their purposes. Current container, printing, labeling, food, resale, and sales-tax rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A food seller bought cardboard, had a printer label it, stapled it to food items in cellophane bags, and sold the cardboard with the goods without return.

California treated the cardboard as an exempt nonreturnable container. The printer's charge was also exempt as part of that container, and the seller could issue resale certificates for both cardboard and printing.

Common questions

Did printing make the cardboard taxable?

No. The source assumed the printing simply labeled the commodities and did not advertise the company.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6364(a) — nonreturnable-container exemption applied
  • Sales and Use Tax Ruling 49 — historical container-exemption explanation cited and listed as an enclosure; enclosure not included in the official PDF
  • Sales and Use Tax Ruling 68 — approved resale-certificate form cited and listed as an enclosure; enclosure not included in the official PDF
  • Requester's March 12 letter — cardboard, printing, labeling, cellophane-bag, food-product, and nonreturn facts described; separate letter not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

195.0180

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-6493

March 21, 1956
[L]
XXX --- ----- --- XX, -Attention:

-- - XXXXX
Mr. [N]

Gentlemen:
In your letter of March 12 you state that you purchase cardboard, furnishing it to a printer for printing, and then using it as a non-returnable container to which is stapled various food items in cellophane bags. You state that the printing does not advertise your company and we assume it is simply the label of the commodities. The printed cardboard is sold with the goods and is not returned to you. It appears from these facts which you set forth in your letter that the cardboard is a nonreturnable container so that the sale thereof to you is exempted from tax under Section 6364(a) of the Sales and Use Tax Law, further explained in Ruling 49, copy enclosed. Thus, the tax does not apply either to the sale of the cardboard to you or to the printer’s charges as the printing is likewise exempt as a part of the non-returnable container. As the commodities sold in the containers are exempt food products, no portion of the gross receipts from such sales are taxable. You may use a resale certificate in purchasing your cardboard and printing. Although you probably have prepared resale certificates for your other vendors, we are, nevertheless, enclosing herewith a copy of Ruling 68 setting forth the approved form of resale certificates. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:ds

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1956. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace