Did California tax materials, fabrication, and leased equipment held temporarily in California before use on Hawaii construction projects?

Short answer California taxed materials delivered and fabrication performed in the state, subject to the stated contractor exemption. Equipment kept only for transport to sole Hawaii use was excluded.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.2490
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-08-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Out-of-state specialty construction contractor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 27, 1993 opinion assumes California delivery or fabrication followed by temporary storage and sole functional use in Hawaii. It responds to a July 27 request and confirms telephone advice given that day; the request, separate call record, supporting records, and enclosed copies of Regulations 1521(b)(6)(B) and 1600 are not reproduced in the official PDF. Seller-permit status, who performed fabrication, the lessor's tax-paid status, any California use, contract terms, later amendments, and current law can change the result. Statutory law controls over an annotation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Materials delivered to the contractor at a California storage site were subject to California sales tax even though the contractor planned to send them to Hawaii. The opinion identified a section 6386 exemption for construction materials incorporated into out-of-state real property, but only for a purchaser holding the required valid California seller's permit.

Independent contractors' charges for fabricating the property in California were also taxable. Work performed by the contractor's own employees was not taxable because wages and salaries were not sales-tax receipts.

Leased construction equipment held in California only to transport it to Hawaii for functional use solely there fell within section 6009.1's exclusion from "use." On the stated facts, the lease was not subject to California tax whether the lessor had acquired the equipment tax-paid or tax-free.

Common questions

Did later shipment to Hawaii make California-delivered materials tax-free?

No, unless the stated out-of-state construction-material exemption and seller-permit requirements were satisfied.

Were California fabrication charges taxable?

Yes for independent fabricators; employee wages were not.

Was leased equipment taxed while awaiting shipment?

No, because it was kept only for transportation to sole use in Hawaii.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6386 — out-of-state construction-material exemption discussed
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6067 and 6009.1 — seller-permit condition and sole-out-of-state-use exclusion applied
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1521(b)(6)(B) and 1600 — identified as applicable and enclosed; enclosure copies not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Requester's July 27, 1993 letter describing three contemplated Hawaii-project transaction patterns — answered; request letter and supporting records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Agency telephone advice given August 27, 1993 — confirmed by the opinion; no separate record of the call reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

190.2490

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-3723

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

August 27, 1993

────────
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. N--- L. G---, CPA
Assistant Controller
S--- F--- Company
XXXXX --- ---, Suite XXX
---, VA XXXXX
Account No. SV -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. G---:
This is in response to your letter of July 27, 1993, and in confirmation of our advice to you by telephone on August 27. We understand that S--- F--- Company is a specialty contractor involved in the design, fabrication, installation, and testing associated with the construction of: (1) Earth Retention Systems (sheeting, jacked piles, underpinning, soil nailing, tiedback walls and bridge abutments); (2) Temporary Soil or Rock Tieback Anchors; and 3) Permanent Soil or Rock Tieback Anchors (tiedowns for structures such as dams and towers, and tiebacks for landslide stabilization and waterfront walls). This agency has issued to your company the consumer use tax account number referenced above. You have been advised by your California sales office that several transactions will be occurring in the near future involving Hawaii construction projects which might result in the imposition of California sales tax. Basically, you describe three factual circumstances. First, it is contemplated that you may purchase items of tangible personal property from a California vendor for shipment to a temporary storage site in California. These properties would ultimately be shipped to Hawaii for physical incorporation, use, or consumption by your own Hawaiian jobsites. These properties fall into two categories: building materials to be physically incorporated into the projects, and supplies or materials to be used or consumed on the projects.

Mr. N--- L. G---

-2-

August 27, 1993
190.2490

As we advised you by telephone, California sales tax would apply to the sale of materials to be physically incorporated into the projects, and to the sale of the other supplies or materials. California sales tax applies because the California tax is imposed upon the vendor (although the cost of the tax is passed on to the purchaser) and the properties are delivered to the purchaser in this state. It is immaterial that the properties will subsequently be removed from California for use outside this state. There is an exemption in California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6386 for sales of construction materials to contractors if the materials are to be incorporated into real property located outside of this state. This exemption is only available to persons who hold a valid California seller’s permit issued under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6067. Second, you inquire with respect to application of the tax under the same factual circumstances described above, except that the property is fabricated to job specifications in California at the temporary storage sites. The contracts with the vendors for sale of the materials are fully taxable as described above. Tax would also apply to charges made by independent contractors to the company for fabrication work performed in California. Again, tax applies to these transactions because the fabricating company is not shipping the work to you outside this state, but is performing work in this state on property which will be returned to you in this state. Tax, of course, does not apply if the fabrication work is performed by your employees. Wages and salaries are not taxable under California Sales Tax Law. Third, you further inquire as to how the tax applies on leases of construction equipment from California lessors for shipment to California temporary storage sites, with ultimate shipment to Hawaii for use on Hawaiian jobsites. Under California law, leases of tangible personal property are basically subject to California sales or use tax if the lessor has not paid sales or use tax at the time of acquisition of the property. If the property is California tax-paid in the hands of the lessor, then the rental receipts are nontaxable without regard to the location of the equipment during the rental period. If the lessor has acquired the equipment tax-free (that is “for resale” under the California law), then generally tax applies to the rental charges. (There is a special rule for leases of mobile transportation equipment such as railcars, trucks, aircraft, and ships, which would not be applicable here.) The basic tax is a use tax imposed upon the lessee. There is an exclusion, however, from the definition of “use,” to be found in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6009.1. Under that section “use” does not include the keeping, retaining, or exercising of any right or power of tangible personal property for the purpose of subsequently transporting it outside the state for use thereafter solely outside the state. Thus, any lease of equipment to you, whether tax-paid or tax-free in the hands of the lessor, would not be subject to tax under the California law, because of the section 6009.1 exclusion. That is, you would be making a functional use of the equipment in Hawaii, and you

Mr. N--- L. G---

-3-

August 27, 1993
190.2490

would be holding the equipment in California only for the purpose of transporting it to Hawaii for use in Hawaii. Enclosed please find copies of our Regulations 1521(b)(6)(B) and 1600, which are applicable to your inquiry. Sincerely,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel
GJJ:sr
Encs.
cc:

Ms. Elizabeth Abreu
Staff Counsel

Sent by facsimile transmission on 8/27/93 to (703) 742-3319; Original letter to follow by mail.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace