How was a contractor taxed on furnishing and installing a water heater?

Short answer A water heater was a fixture taxed at selling price excluding installation. For a lump-sum nonmanufacturer, contractor cost was the measure; tax-paid heaters caused no further tax.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.2360
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1953-12-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
F--- F---, Jr., CPA

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1953
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 21, 1953 Junior Counsel letter applies former Board Ruling 11 to a contractor furnishing and installing a water heater. The November 23 and December 9 requests are identified but not reproduced in the official PDF, and their years are not supplied. It distinguishes fixture selling price from installation and gives a cost measure for lump-sum contractors that do not manufacture the heater. Current plumbing, tax-paid purchase, credit, and contractor rules should be checked before use.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A water heater was a fixture, and the contractor's sale of it was taxable. The selling-price measure excluded the installation charge.

For a lump-sum contract where the contractor did not manufacture the water heater, former Board Ruling 11 treated the contractor's cost as the heater's retail selling price.

If a nonmanufacturing contractor bought the water heater tax-paid and installed it under a lump-sum contract, no further tax was due on that transaction.

Common questions

Was a water heater material?

No. The letter classified it as a fixture.

Was installation included in taxable selling price?

No.

What measure applied to a lump-sum nonmanufacturer?

The contractor's cost of the heater.

Was more tax due after a tax-paid purchase?

No, under the described historical rule.

Citations and references

  • Former California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11 — materials and fixtures, installation exclusion, lump-sum nonmanufacturer cost measure, and tax-paid purchase treatment applied
  • November 23 and December 9 accounting-firm letters — asked about sales tax on furnishing and installing a water heater; years and separate requests not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

190.2360

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

December 21, 1953

Mr. F--- F---, Jr.
Certified Public Accountant
XXX --- --- ----- ---, California

Your letters of November 23
And December 9

Dear Mr. F---:
You inquire concerning the application of sales tax to the furnishing and installation of a water heater. Ruling 11 states that contractors are the consumers of “materials” and the retailers of “fixtures”. Accordingly, the sale of “materials” to a contractor is the taxable retail sale while the sale of “fixtures” by the contractor is the taxable retail sale. A water heater is a “fixture” and the tax applies to the contractor’s retail selling price of the heater, which price does not include the charge for installation. If the contract is a lump-sum contract, it would be difficult to apportion the contract between selling price of fixture and charge for installation. Ruling 11 therefore provides that in the case of a lump-sum contract by a contractor who is not the manufacturer of the fixture, the retail selling price is the contractor’s cost. If a contractor who is not a manufacturer of water heaters purchases water heaters tax paid and installs them under lump-sum contracts, no further tax is due with respect to such transactions. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden,
Junior Counsel
BH:ja
cc:

--- --- - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1953. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace