When was a prefabricated walk-in cooler material rather than a fixture?

Short answer It was material when affixed as an integral part of realty. A self-contained unit merely fastened in place, retaining identity and removable without realty damage, was a fixture.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.2334
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1962-06-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Z--- C---, Inc.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1962. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1962
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The official PDF contains Tax Counsel letters dated May 11 and June 27, 1962; the later letter clarifies the controlling material-versus-fixture distinction and its date is used here. The May 2 and May 29 requests and enclosed copies of Rulings 11 and 58 are not reproduced in the official PDF. The result depends on whether the cooler becomes integral to realty or remains a self-contained identifiable unit removable without damage. The historical delivery rules discussed in the source must be checked against current law.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A walk-in cooler was material when affixed so that it became an integral part of real property. In that case, the contractor consumed the materials and tax was measured by cost, provided it did not charge the buyer tax on a marked-up material price.

A self-contained prefabricated unit merely fastened to the realty, retaining its identity and removable without damage, was instead a fixture. The fixture measure included the material sales price plus fabrication labor performed before installation.

Installation labor on sales of shelving, gondolas, and special refrigerated cases was excluded under section 6012. The two letters also described then-current delivery rules: seller-delivery charges generally remained taxable when title passed after delivery, while documented pre-delivery title passage could support exclusion of reasonable charges.

Common questions

Were all walk-in coolers materials?

No. Integration into realty was required.

When was a cooler a fixture?

When it remained a self-contained identifiable unit that could be removed without damaging the realty.

Was installation labor taxable on the listed retail equipment?

No, under section 6012 as applied in the May letter.

Did seller delivery automatically qualify for exclusion?

No. The historical rule depended on title passage and reasonable, documented delivery charges.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 — installation-labor exclusion discussed in the May 11 letter
  • Former California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11 — walk-in cooler materials, fixtures, contractor-consumer, and fixture measure rules applied
  • Former California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 58 — seller-delivery charge and passage-of-title rule cited in the June 27 letter
  • May 2, 1962 taxpayer letter — requested approval of walk-in cooler tax procedures and asked about delivery and installation charges; facts summarized and answered, but the letter is not reproduced in the official PDF
  • May 29, 1962 taxpayer letter — described prefabricated cooler assembly, fasteners and lag bolts, and requested further cooler and delivery-charge guidance; facts summarized and answered, but the letter is not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Enclosed copies of former Sales and Use Tax Rulings 11 and 58 — identified as separate enclosures to the two letters; copies not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

190.2334

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

May 11, 1962

Z--- C---, Inc.
XXXX --- --- --- Street
Post Office Box XX
---, California
Attention:

-- - XXXXX

Mr. W--- M--General Manager

Gentlemen:
In your letter of May 2, 1962, you request written approval of your procedure for satisfying your sales and use tax liability on Walk-In Coolers which are constructed by you. You indicate that your procedure has been to pay sales tax only on the materials used in manufacturing the coolers. Walk-In Coolers are regarded as “materials” within the meaning of Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11, copy enclosed, in which case the contractor is the consumer of the materials and thus taxable at his cost provided that the Walk-In Cooler is affixed to and becomes an integral part of real property, and provided further that sales tax is not charged to the buyer on a marked up price for the “materials” (see Ruling 11). So far as can be determined from your letter, you are following the correct procedure for “material” consumed in building Walk-In Coolers. Your letter indicates that you are aware that a different basis is applicable for sales of refrigeration equipment. You also inquire if it is proper to pay the sales tax on the f.o.b. plant sales price of such items as perimeter wall shelving, gondolas, and special refrigerated cases excluding charges for delivery and installation of the items. Charges for installation labor on sales of such items are exempt from the tax under the provisions of Section 6012 of the Sales and Use Tax Law. Under present law, delivery charges are exempt from the tax only where the buyer has acquired title to the goods prior to the transportation and provided that such charges do not exceed the amount paid to a carrier or a reasonable amount for delivery by the seller’s own facilities. However, a change in the law has been made for delivery charges which will become effective as of July 3, 1962. Basically, the change provides that the delivery charges will be exempt irrespective of the point of passage of title where delivery is made by independent carrier; i.e., facilities other than that of the seller. Where delivery is made by the seller’s facilities, they will still be taxable under the new law unless title has passed to the buyer prior to the transportation.

Z--- C---, Inc.
Account -- - XXXXX

-2-

May 11, 1962
190.2334

We trust the foregoing explanations will be satisfactory; however, if you have further questions, please feel free to write us again. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel

By______
W. E. Burkett
WEB:dm
Enclosure
cc:

--- --- – Tax Administrator

190.2334

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

June 27, 1962

Z--- C---, Inc.
XXXX --- --- --- Street
P. O. Box XX
---, California

Attention:

Mr. R--- L. T--Assistant Office Manager

Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of May 29 in which you indicate that some doubts still exist in your mind as to walk-in coolers which you assemble and attach to real property. You state that these walk-in coolers are prefabricated at your plant and assembled as a prefabricated unit at the jobsite. They are affixed to the realty by means of fasteners and lag bolts. As indicated in our previous letter, we regard walk-in boxes as “materials” in those instances where they are affixed to and become an integral part of the real property. On the other hand, if your job merely entails fastening a self-contained unit to the realty, which does not lose its identity and can be removed without damage to the realty, then we think the walk-in box in this instance would properly be classified as a fixture. In this latter instance, tax would then become due on the sales price of the material plus the fabrication labor involved prior to installation. In your letter, you also indicate a desire for a ruling on the taxability of charges for delivery made as incident to sales of such items as gondolas, check stands, and special refrigeration cases. Where the delivery is made by your own facilities and title does not pass until after delivery, there is no basis for exempting the delivery charges from the measure of the sales tax. See enclosed copy of Ruling 58. This is not a matter of administrative discretion but a matter of basic statutory law which we are bound to follow. However, if you could provide in your contracts for the passage of title to the buyer prior to delivery and clearly indicate this in your agreement, the charges would be exempt from the tax provided that they represented a reasonable charge for delivery by your facilities.

Z--- C---, Inc.

-2-

June 27, 1962
190.2334

We trust the foregoing will be sufficient to further clarify your doubts in these two areas. However, please feel free to write us again if you have additional questions. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
By____
W. E. Burkett

WEB:dse
Enc
cc:

--- --- – District Tax Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1962. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace