Were off-the-shelf telephone channel-bank units installed for the U.S. government exempt from California sales tax?

Short answer Yes. They were machinery and equipment: the contractor's purchase was for resale, and its sale to the U.S. government was exempt because title passed before any contractor use.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.1050
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-12-18
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A communications contractor bidding on a U.S. government project

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 18, 1989 opinion concerns freestanding D-4 channel-bank units described as standardized off-the-shelf switching equipment for general-purpose office buildings, with title passing to the U.S. government before any contractor use. The requester's fax and the enclosed construction-contractor tax-tip pamphlet are not reproduced in the official PDF. Custom integration, attachment, pre-transfer testing or use, title terms, purchaser identity, later statutes and regulations, and current law can change the exemption.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The contractor could buy the D-4 channel-bank units as an exempt purchase for resale. The units were freestanding multiplexers providing ports to standardized, off-the-shelf, general-purpose telephone switching equipment used in ordinary office buildings.

The later sale to the U.S. government was also exempt. The legal staff classified the units as machinery and equipment rather than construction materials or fixtures, and the stated facts required title to pass to the federal government before the contractor used them.

Common questions

Was the contractor's purchase taxable?

No. It was a purchase for resale under the stated facts.

Was the federal sale taxable?

No, because the units were machinery and equipment sold to the U.S. government before contractor use.

Did title timing matter?

Yes. The opinion relied on title passing before any use by the contractor.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6007 — purchase-for-resale treatment
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381 — U.S. government sale exemption
  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 1521(a)(6), (b)(1)(B), and (c)(7) — machinery-and-equipment classification cited by the opinion
  • Requester's fax communication to the Board's Executive Director — proposed federal contract, channel-bank units, and title passage described; not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Board tax-tip pamphlet for construction contractors — Regulation 1521 and other business information identified as enclosed; not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

190.1050

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-8485

December 18, 1989

Mr. D--- J---, President
C--- C--- Systems, Inc.
XXXX --- --- Court
---, FL XXXXX

Dear Mr. J---:
This is in reply to your FAX communication to the Board’s Executive Director, Ms. Cindy Rambo. C--- C--- Systems, Inc. (CCSI) intends to bid on a U. S. Government contract for the furnishing and installation of “D-4 channel bank units.” You have described the units as free standing multiplexers which provide porting to modular/standardized off-shelf general purpose switching equipment sold for use in general purpose office buildings. Title to the units will pass to the U. S. Government prior to any use of them by CCSI. Under the foregoing circumstances, you wondered whether we would classify these units as machinery and equipment for sales and use tax purposes such that the sale to CCSI would be an exempt sale for resale and CCSI’s subsequent retail sale would also be exempt as a sale to the U. S. Government. Your FAX communication indicates your general familiarity with the applicable law so we will only refer summarily to the applicable principles in stating our conclusions. We agree that the sale of the units to CCSI is an exempt sale for resale (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6007). The subsequent retail sale is, in our opinion, a sale of off-shelf general purpose switching equipment sold for use in general purpose office buildings and, accordingly, is classifiable as machinery and equipment the sale of which, prior to any use by CCSI, is an exempt sale to the U. S. Government (See Rev. & Tax. Code § 6381; Reg. 1521(a)(6), (b)(1)(B), and (c)(7)).

Mr. D--- J---

-2-

December 18, 1989
190.1050

Enclosed for your ready reference is a copy of our tax tip pamphlet for construction contractors which, in addition to Regulation 1521, contains other information you may find helpful in your business. Sincerely,

E. L. Sorensen, Jr.
Senior Tax Counsel

ELS:jb
Enclosure
cc:

Ms. Cindy Rambo

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace