Was furnishing and installing a church reredos a construction contract, and who owed use tax on out-of-state materials?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Furnishing and installing the church reredos was a contract to improve real property. The installer was therefore the consumer of all tangible personal property incorporated into the reredos or otherwise used in California to perform the contract.
California use tax applied to the installer's purchase price for qualifying property bought outside the state and used in the project. The letter's quoted rates, deadlines, penalties, and interest concern 1949 transactions and are historical.
Common questions
Was the reredos sold as tangible personal property?
No. The agreement was treated as a construction contract.
Who consumed its materials and pieces?
The installer responsible for the complete reredos.
Did out-of-state purchasing eliminate California tax?
No. The letter applied use tax to the qualifying purchases.
Citations and references
- Former Board Ruling 11, Construction Contractors — construction-contractor and consumer classification applied and identified as enclosed
- December 1, 1948 church-reredos contract and other pertinent transaction information — identified as examined; not reproduced in the official PDF
- Two consumer's use tax return forms and a duplicate copy of the February 16, 1950 letter — identified as enclosed for reporting and extension purposes; not reproduced in the official PDF
- California Sales and Use Tax Law — identified as enclosed; the separate copy is not reproduced in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/190-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/190-0760.pdf
Original ruling text
190.0760
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
February 16, 1950
W--- C--- of A--XXXX --- --- Street
---, Illinois
Attention:
Mr. F. D--Vice-President
OS-U-XXX
Gentlemen:
It has come to our attention that in October of 1949 you completed performance of a contract with the F--- C--- C--- of [---] for the furnishing and installation in the church of reredos, the date of the contract being December 1, 1948. The question of the application of the California sales tax or use tax has been presented to us for our determination. Following examination of the agreement and pertinent information obtained relative to this transaction, it is our opinion that in the performance of this contract you acted as a contractor for the construction of an improvement on or to real property, and, therefore, are considered the consumer of all of the tangible personal property entering into the complete reredos, or being used in any way in this State in the performance of the contract. Accordingly, the California use tax is applicable to the sales price to you of the tangible personal property purchased outside this State and used in this State in the fulfillment of this contract. The tax is measured by three per cent of the purchase price of such tangible personal property purchased July 1, 1949, or afterward, and at the rate of two and one-half per cent of such tangible personal property as may have been purchased prior to July 1, 1949. Inasmuch as our records do not indicate that you file sales tax or use tax returns with us, we are enclosing herewith a form of consumer’s use tax return for your use in reporting the purchase price of the tangible personal property subject to the use tax, as indicated herein. It is our understanding that the materials or pieces from which the reredos was assembled were shipped to Los Angeles in September of 1949. If this is correct, the due date of the tax was October 31, 1949, being the last day of the month following the close of the calendar quarter in which the property was first stored or used in this State, which the law prescribes as the time within which a return and payment must be made. For nonpayment within the required time, the law imposes a penalty of ten percent of the tax plus interest at one-half of one per cent per month, or fraction thereof, until the date of payment.
W--- C--- of A---
-2-
February 16, 1950
190.0760
In the event some of the materials or parts were not shipped to this State until October of 1949, the tax thereon was not due until January 21, 1949, but since the question of the application of tax was presented to this office prior to that time we are granting you herewith an extension of time for one month, the maximum time the law permits us to grant, or until February 28, 1950, for the filing of a return for the fourth quarter of 1949. An additional form of consumer’s use tax return is enclosed for reporting any tax that may be due for that quarter. Kindly attach the duplicate copy of this letter to that return in order to identify it as a return for which an extension of time has been granted. If the enveloped in which the return is forwarded is postmarked not later than February 28, 1950, it will be accepted as filed within the period of the extension. Copies of the Sales and Use Tax Law, and Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11, Construction Contractors, are enclosed. Very truly yours,
E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:fb
cc:
Mr Dixwell L. Pierce
Mr. Wm. R. Thomson
Mr. F. A. Lagomarsino
cc:
---, ---, --Attorneys at Law
XXX --- --- Bank Building
--- --- XX, California
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace