When was elevator assembly taxable fabrication rather than nontaxable installation?

Short answer Separate assembly of an elevator was taxable fabrication, but inseparable onsite assembly and installation was installation of the taxable component parts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.0280
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-05-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Mr. H. C. Motley

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 2, 1950 Board memorandum applies former Ruling 15 to elevator assembly and installation. An official August 8, 1989 note states that Regulation 1521(c)(6) now covers elevator installations, so the historical distinction is not a current standalone rule.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Assembling an elevator separately from installing it was a production, fabrication, or processing step. The charge for that assembly for a consumer was taxable under former Ruling 15.

When assembly and installation were indivisible because the fixture did not exist as a unit until its parts were attached to the realty, the component parts were the property sold. The charge for installing those parts into the building was not taxable even though installation also completed the assembly.

The source's 1989 note says Regulation 1521(c)(6) now covers elevator installations.

Common questions

Was separate elevator assembly taxable?

Yes, under the historical rule.

What if the elevator only came into existence through onsite attachment?

Then the indivisible work was treated as installation of the component parts.

Citations and references

  • Former Board Ruling 15 — fabrication and processing rule applied in the memorandum
  • Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18, § 1521(c)(6) — current elevator-installation provision identified by the source's 1989 note

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. H. C. Motley (FCP)

From:

R. G. Hamlin

Subject:

--Elevator Maintenance

190.0280

May 2, 1950


You have inquired whether the labor in the assembling of an elevator is taxable under Ruling 15. You are advised that we regard the assembling of an elevator as distinguished from its installation, as a step in the production, fabrication, or processing of tangible personal property within the meaning of Ruling 15. Therefore, the tax will apply to the charge for assembling an elevator for a consumer. Where the assembling of the component parts of a fixture and the installation thereof constitute an indivisible operation, that is, where the fixture does not exist as a unit until its component parts are attached to the realty, we would regard the component parts of the fixture as the property sold. In this event, the tax would not apply to the charge for installing the component parts of the fixture into the building, even though the installation constitutes, in part, the assembly of the completed fixture.

RGH:hb

8/8/89 Regulation 1521(c)(6) now covers elevator installations.

DJH.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace