Who owed California sales tax when representatives marketed and sold a photographer's work?

Short answer The stock-photo agency was the retailer because it possessed the originals and controlled sale terms. For the other representative, the photographer remained liable unless he proved she was a consignee or resale buyer.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 185.0250
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-07-01
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A photographer asking who owed tax on sales handled by two representatives (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 1, 1992 senior-tax-counsel letter analyzes two different representative relationships using the facts and contract then provided. The second relationship lacked a written contract and enough facts for a definitive answer, so the source placed the proof burden on the photographer. Different agreements or current law may change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A photographer used one agency to syndicate and sell existing stock photographs. The photographer retained ownership of the originals, but delivered them to the agency, gave it exclusive worldwide representation, and allowed it to set all sale and syndication terms.

The letter treated that agency as a consignee under Regulation 1569. Because it possessed the photographer's property and could exercise the power to sell it, the agency was responsible for reporting and paying sales tax on its retail sales.

A second representative marketed the photographer's work, estimated job prices, invoiced clients, collected sales-tax reimbursement, and sent the photographer his percentage. There was no written contract, and the Board said the record was insufficient for a definitive classification.

Section 6091's presumption and proof rule therefore mattered. The photographer remained responsible for tax on artwork sold through that representative unless he could prove that she either sold as a consignee or bought the artwork for resale. If she was merely his sales agent, he was the retailer and she was entitled to a refund of tax she had paid. If he proved she was the retailer, he was entitled to a refund of tax he had paid.

The letter also said the photographer needed a seller's permit if he sold artwork to the representative for resale, even if all of his sales were resale transactions.

Common questions

Why was the stock-photo agency the retailer?

It held the originals and had contractual authority to set the terms and make the sales.

Did collecting and remitting tax make the other representative the retailer?

Not by itself. Her legal role depended on facts the photographer had not supplied.

Who bore the risk of that missing proof?

The photographer. He remained liable unless he established consignment or a resale purchase.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1569 (as cited)
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6091 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

185.0250

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

July 1, 1992

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. H--- P--H--- P--- P--XXXX --- Avenue
--- ---, CA XXXXX
SR – XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. P---:
As you know, your April 2 and April 20, 1992 letters to the State Board of Equalization have been referred to the legal staff for reply. We understand that you are a photographer. You are represented by an agent, Ms. P--P---. You explained that her responsibilities are to market and sell your photography to potential and actual clients. She provides the clients with estimates of the cost of the job, and she issues invoices to the client after you complete the photography. When she receives payment from the client she sends you a check for your percentage of the charge. She has been collecting sales tax reimbursement from the clients and paying the amount in full to the Board of Equalization. You do not have a written contract with her. You also contract with the O--- agency which syndicates photographs which you have already taken. You sent a copy of your contract with the O--- agency. We note the following relevant provisions of the contract: "l. During the term of this Agreement, O--- shall serve as Photographer's sole and exclusive worldwide representative in connection with the syndication and sale of stock photographs. In that capacity, O--- shall use its reasonable best efforts to syndicate and sell stock photographs taken by Photographer. Photographer shall not retain any other representative in connection with the syndication or sale of stock photographs during the term of this Agreement. Photographer agrees not to syndicate or sell stock photographs taken by him directly, and shall promptly refer all inquiries regarding the syndication or sale of stock photographs to O---.

Mr. H--- P---

-2-

July 1, 1992
185.0250

"2. Photographer shall apply O--- with originals of all stock photographs which are intended for syndication or sale. All original photographs provided to O--shall remain Photographer's property, and O--- agrees to return them to Photographer upon termination of this Agreement, if so requested. It is understood, however, that original photographs may become damaged or lost through no fault of O---, in which case O--- shall bear no responsibility for such damage or loss. "3. During the term of this Agreement, O--- shall have the right to set the terms and conditions of all syndications and sales of Photographer's stock photographs. "4. In consideration of the services rendered and to be rendered by O---, Photographer agrees to pay to O--- fifty percent (50%) of all monies actually received by O--- on account of syndications or sales of stock photographs taken by Photographer, which syndications or sale are negotiated or made during the term of this agreement...." "8. The relationship between Photographer and O--- shall be that of independent contractors, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall render the relationship a joint venture, partnership or employment relationship...." Based on the information you have provided, it appears that O--- is a consignee of your photographs. In this regard, Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1569 provides as follows: "A person who has possession of property owned by another, and also the power to cause title to that property to be transferred to a third person without any further action on the part of its owner, and who exercises such power, is a retailer when the party to whom title is transferred is a consumer. Tax applies to his gross receipts from such a sale...." O--- is responsible for reporting and paying sales tax on its retail sales of your photographs. We do not have sufficient facts regarding your contract with Ms. P--- P--- in order to provide you with a definitive answer. However, it does not appear that Ms. P--- is a consignee of your photographs under Regulation 1569. The California Sales and Use Tax Law provides a presumption that all gross receipts are subject to tax until the contrary is established. The burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at retail is upon the person who makes the sale unless he takes from the purchaser a certificate to the effect the property is purchased for resale. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6091.) Accordingly, you are responsible for reporting and paying sales tax on your sales of artwork to Ms. P--- P--- unless you can prove that Ms. P--- either sells the artwork as a consignee or purchases the artwork from you for resale to her clients. If you are able to prove that Ms. P--- is the retailer of your photographs, you are

Mr. H--- P---

-3-

July 1, 1992
185.0250

entitled to a refund of the tax that you paid. On the other hand, if Ms. P--- is merely making the sales as an agent on your behalf, then you are responsible for reporting and paying the tax, and Ms. P--- is entitled to a refund of the tax paid by her. Further, if you make sales to Ms. P--- for resale, you are required to hold a seller's permit regardless that all your sales may be for resale. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write directly to this office. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
cc: --- --- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace