Did a pet store owe sales tax on the full selling price of consigned pets, or only on its commission after deducting animal-care expenses?

Short answer Tax applied to the full gross receipts. The store was the retailer of consigned pets and could not deduct commissions, keeping costs, labor, losses, or other expenses.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 185.0180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-06-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A pet store asking how sales tax applied to its retail and consignment pet sales (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 13, 1950 associate-tax-counsel letter applies the then-current gross-receipts definition and historical Ruling 39 to a pet store's consignment sales. It suggests recomputing tax if only commissions had been reported. Current statutes, regulations, consignment terms, retailer status, and any animal-specific rules control. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A pet store sold pets at retail, including animals consigned by their owners.

Associate tax counsel said sales tax was measured by the store's full gross receipts. The store could not deduct the cost of the pets, materials, labor or services, losses, animal-keeping expenses, or other costs.

Under historical Ruling 39, a person possessing tangible personal property for sale to consumers was treated as the retailer. The store therefore had to report the entire receipt from each consigned-pet sale, not merely its commission.

Common questions

Could the store deduct the cost of keeping a pet until sale?

No. The letter included that expense among the nondeductible costs.

Was tax measured only by the consignment commission?

No. Counsel said commission-only reporting understated the taxable gross receipts.

Why was the store treated as the retailer?

It possessed the pets for the purpose of retail sale to consumers.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 39 (historical, as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

185.0180

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

June 13, 1950

--- --- ----- --- ----- --- --Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of May 25 with respect to the application of the State sales tax to your sales of pets. You are advised that the State sales tax will apply to your retail sale of pets, measured by your gross receipts from such sales. “Gross receipts” are defined in the Sales and Use Tax Law, in part, to mean the total amount of the sales price of the retail sale of retailers, without deduction on account of the cost of the property sold, the cost of materials used, labor or service cost, losses, or any other expense. Accordingly, you may not take a deduction in your sales and use tax return for the cost or expense of keeping a pet until it is sold. As indicated by Sales and Use Tax Ruling 39, copy enclosed, persons having possession of tangible personal property for the purpose of sale, are regarded as the retailers of the property to consumers, and tax applies to the receipts from such sales. Therefore, you are required to report and pay the tax with respect to your sales of pets which are consigned to you for sale by their owners. If you have been paying the tax measured by the amount of your commission on consignment sales, it would appear that you have erroneously computed the tax. We suggest that you consult a member of the staff of our district office, 215 Central Building, San Bernardino, California, as to recomputation of the tax. Very truly yours,

R. H. Hamlin
Associate Tax Counsel

RGH:HB
cc:

W. C. Shay

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace