Did owner approval of a lower house-trailer price keep the consignment dealer from being the retailer?

Short answer Not necessarily. If the dealer could transfer title and did so—by selling the trailer or obtaining and delivering the owner's signed bill of sale—the dealer was the retailer and the sale was taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 185.0160
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1957-05-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A purchaser asking whether tax applied to a consigned house-trailer sale (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1957. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1957
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 2, 1957 associate-tax-counsel letter gives a conditional answer because the source does not establish exactly who transferred title. It addresses a consigned house trailer, a below-asking-price offer approved by the owner, a dealer commission, and collected tax reimbursement under historical Ruling 39. Current law and title documents control. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A dealer held a house trailer on consignment. The purchaser offered less than the dealer could accept, so the owner joined the discussion and approved the deal. The owner paid the dealer a commission, and the dealer collected sales-tax reimbursement from the purchaser.

The letter did not say that the owner's price approval alone made the owner the retailer. Instead, it asked who had and exercised power to transfer title.

If the dealer could transfer title and did so—either by selling the trailer or by obtaining the legal owner's signed bill of sale and delivering it to the purchaser—the dealer was the retailer and its sale to the purchaser was taxable under the historical rule.

Because the source did not establish the actual title-transfer steps, the conclusion remained conditional.

Common questions

Did the owner's participation in setting the price decide retailer status?

No. The letter focused on who could and did transfer title.

Did collecting tax reimbursement prove the dealer was liable?

The source reported that fact, but stated its test in terms of exercised title-transfer power.

What title act could make the dealer the retailer?

Selling under its own power or obtaining and delivering the owner's signed bill of sale.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 39 (historical, as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

185.0160

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

May 2, 1957

--- --- ----- --- ----- --- --Dear Mr. ---:
In your letter of February 18 you requested information regarding application of tax to the sale of a house trailer. You gave the following details:
--- had a house trailer for sale on consignment. You made an offer to buy the trailer, which was less than the dealer could accept. He called in the owner and the deal was closed. The owner paid the dealer a commission and the dealer collected sales tax reimbursement from you. The question is whether sales tax applies to the sale of the trailer. Persons who have the power to transfer title to property and exercise it by selling it or obtaining a signed bill of sale from the legal owner and delivering it to the purchaser, are regarded as retailers and sales tax applies to the sales of such property to them. Thus, if --- had the power to transfer title to the trailer to you and did so in the aforementioned manner, they would be retailers and their sale to you subject to tax. Enclosed is a copy of Ruling 39, for your convenience. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Associate Tax Counsel

GAT:rc
Enclosure
Cc:

-- - Compliance

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1957. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace