Did showing and arranging financing for customer-owned airplanes make a tie-down operator the retailer?

Short answer No, if the operator only demonstrated the planes, answered questions, or arranged financing and lacked power to transfer title. If it had and exercised that power, it owed tax on the entire gross receipts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 185.0020
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-08-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An airplane seller and tie-down operator asking about customer-owned aircraft sales (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 19, 1964 associate-tax-counsel letter applies a historical yacht-broker opinion by analogy to customer-owned airplanes stored at a tie-down facility. Its conditional result turns on whether the operator had and exercised unilateral power to vest title, not merely on commissions, demonstrations, or financing help. Current law and contracts may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An airplane business also provided tie-down storage for aircraft owned by customers. Some owners advertised those planes at the storage area, and prospective buyers asked the operator about their condition. The operator sometimes demonstrated the planes or arranged financing for the owner and buyer in exchange for a commission.

The letter applied the title-power test used for yacht brokers. Merely bringing the parties together, showing the airplane, answering condition questions, or arranging financing did not make the operator the retailer if it lacked power, by its own act, to vest title in the buyer.

If the operator did have that power and exercised it, the result reversed: it was liable for sales tax measured by the entire gross receipts from the transaction.

Common questions

Did earning a commission make the operator the retailer?

No. The source focused on title-transfer power, not the commission alone.

Did arranging financing make the operator the seller?

Not without authority to vest title in the buyer.

What happened if the operator could and did transfer title?

It owed sales tax on the entire gross receipts from that sale.

Citations and references

  • California Attorney General yacht-broker opinion (as cited; number omitted)

Source

Original ruling text

185.0020

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

August 19, 1964

“G”
This is in reply to your letter of August 6.
It is our understanding, from your letter, that you are in the business of selling airplanes. You also furnish tie-down facilities for the storage of aircraft owned by others. You state that occasionally your tie-down customers advertise their planes for sale at the storage area. Prospective buyers make inquiries of you regarding the condition of these planes. Sometimes the buyer or owner may have you arrange for financing of the sale of one of such planes. You receive, or plan to receive, a commission for your demonstration and financing services. Pursuant to an opinion of the Attorney General rendered a number of years ago, yacht brokers are not regarded as retailers with respect to transactions in which they merely bring the buyer and seller together and do not have either the beneficial use of the boat or the power, by their own act, to vest title in another and exercised that power, he was a retailer and liable for sales tax with respect to the gross receipts from such transactions. We believe that the some considerations are applicable in determining the application of tax with respect to sales of aircraft. Accordingly, if your only connection with the sales of airplanes owned by your tie-down customers is to show the airplanes to buyers and answer their inquiries regarding their condition, or to arrange for financing, without your having or exercising the power by your own act to vest title in the buyer, you will not be liable for sales tax. On the other hand, if you have such power and exercise it, you will be liable for the sales tax with respect to the entire gross receipts from such transactions. Very truly yours,

George A. Trigueros
Associate Tax Counsel

GAT:md

[lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace