Did hiring a California collection agency to persuade customers to pay debts make an out-of-state mail-order seller collect use tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California legal staff said an out-of-state mail-order retailer did not become a retailer engaged in business in the state merely by hiring a California collection agency on the described facts.
The agency's employees would persuade debtors to pay their creditors directly; they would not collect funds or sell, deliver, install, assemble, or take orders for tangible personal property. Staff therefore found no collection duty under section 6203(b), assuming the retailer had no other relevant representative or activity in California.
California purchasers still owed use tax. The retailer could voluntarily register to collect it. Because the client was unidentified, the opinion said it did not qualify for section 6596 reliance relief.
Common questions
Did debt collection count as selling activity?
No, under the facts described.
Did California customers still owe use tax?
Yes.
Could the seller collect voluntarily?
Yes, by registering voluntarily.
Could the unidentified seller rely on this letter for section 6596 relief?
No.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6203(b) — in-state representative activities interpreted
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596 — reliance relief unavailable to the unidentified taxpayer
- California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6051, 6201, and 6401; Regulation 1620 — sales and use tax framework discussed
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/175-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/175-0017.pdf
Original ruling text
175.0017
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 322-2976
FAX: (916) 323-3387
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
August 7, 1995
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
REDACTED TEXT
Re:
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
Unidentified Taxpayer
Dear REDACTED TEXT:
This is in response to your letter dated June 13, 1995 in which you request a ruling regarding the application of tax to the proposed business activities of your out-of-state client. I note that the only basis for the Board to relieve a person of otherwise properly due taxes is pursuant to the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596. To come within the provisions of that section, the taxpayer must have reasonably relied on the Board's written advice which was in response to a written request for advice that disclosed all relevant facts, including the identity of the taxpayer. Since your client is not identified, this opinion does not come within the provisions of section 6596. You state that your client, which operates a mail order business in an east coast city, has no personnel in California, nor does it maintain any office space in this state. Your client would like to use the services of a collection agency located in California. The agency does not collect funds on behalf of the creditors; instead, employees attempt to persuade debtors to pay amounts they owe directly to their creditors. Your client is concerned that if it signs an agreement with this collection agency for collection and accounts receivable management services, your client will incur tax liability. DISCUSSION Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) When sales tax does not apply, such as when sales take place outside of California, the use tax, measured by the sales price of the property sold, applies to the use of property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401, Reg. 1620.) Although the purchaser owes the use tax, a retailer engaged in business in this state is required to collect the use tax from the purchaser and pay it to this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203.) “Retailer engaged in business in this state” includes any retailer having any representative, agent, salesperson, canvasser, independent contractor, or solicitor operating in
REDACTED TEXT
-2-
August 7, 1995
175.0017
this state under the authority of the retailer or its subsidiary for the purpose of selling, delivering, installing, assembling, or the taking of orders for any tangible personal property. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203(b).) You state that the collection agency would act on behalf of your client in attempting to secure payment of debts owed to it. We do not regard such debt collection activities as being for the purpose of selling, delivering, installing, assembling, or the taking of orders for tangible personal property. Assuming your client does not otherwise have a representative, agent, salesperson, canvasser, independent contractor, or solicitor, as those terms are used in subdivision (b) of section 6203, operating in this state for the purpose of selling, delivering, installing, assembling, or the taking of orders for any tangible personal property, your client is not a retailer engaged in business in this state under subdivision (b) of section 6203. The facts you provide do not indicate that any other provision of section 6203 would apply to your client's situation to bring it within the definition of a retailer engaged in business in this state. Although your client's California purchasers are liable for the applicable use tax on their mail order purchases, your client is not required to collect that tax from them if it is not engaged in business in this state within the meaning of section 6203. Of course, your client may voluntarily register to collect the use tax from its California purchasers. If you have further questions, please feel free to write again. Sincerely,
Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel
KWC:cl
cc:
Out-of-State District Administrator
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace