Could California file a new notice with a different number after releasing an earlier notice for the same statutory tax lien?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California legal staff distinguished the underlying statutory sales-tax lien from the individual Notices of State Tax Lien filed or recorded to preserve and publicize it.
Under the statutes then in effect, the memorandum said the statutory lien continued for at least ten years unless the tax, interest, and penalties were paid or a court released it. Multiple notices could be filed, recorded, and released during that period without necessarily affecting the underlying lien.
A notice filed or recorded before the current ten-year period expired could extend the lien for another ten years, and a later notice could use a different lien number. Staff distinguished this statutory lien from a judgment lien because no court judgment existed in the case.
Common questions
Did releasing one notice automatically release the statutory lien?
No, according to the letter.
Could a replacement notice use a new lien number?
Yes.
Were judgment-lien time limits relevant?
No, because the Board had not obtained a court judgment.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6757 — statutory sales-tax lien discussed
- California Government Code section 7172 — historical ten-year duration and extension rules discussed
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6736 et seq. — separate judgment procedure distinguished
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/170-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/170-0200.pdf
Original ruling text
170.0200
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
MEMBER
First District
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6496
BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
October 15, 1993
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
Mr. L--- M--The M--- Company
XXXX East --- Avenue
---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. M---:
Re:
Release and Re-Recording of State Tax Lien
SR --- XX-XXXXXX
Gordon Adelman has requested that I respond to your letter to him dated September 7, 1993. In your letter, you ask 1. period?
Is it legal to re-record a lien previously released or abated for the same time
2.
If the answer is yes, what is the statute of limitations in re-recording a lien and does that lien require the same lien number to be valid? California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6757 provides that if any person fails to pay any amount imposed under the California Sales and Use Tax Law at the time that it becomes due and payable, the amount thereof shall thereupon be a perfected and enforceable state tax lien. California Government Code section 7172 provides that a state tax lien continues in effect for 10 years from the date of its creation unless it is sooner released or otherwise discharged, and is extinguished 10 years from the date of its creation unless a Notice of State Tax Lien is recorded with a County Recorder's office where real property is located, or filed with the California Secretary of State's office. When a Notice of State Tax Lien is recorded or filed, the lien continues in effect for 10 years from the date of filing or recording and the lien can be
Mr. L--- M---
-2-
October 15, 1993
170.0200
extended for an additional 10 years if a new Notice of State Tax Lien is filed or recorded prior to the expiration of the 10-year period from the last filing or recording. It is our opinion that the statutory state tax lien provided by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6757 continues for a minimum 10-year period unless all tax, interest and penalties have been paid prior to the expiration of that period, or the statutory lien has been released by court order. It is also our opinion that any number of Notices of State Tax Lien may be filed or recorded and then "released" in that 10-year period and the statutory state tax lien is unaffected. If prior to the expiration of the initial 10-year period, a Notice of State Tax Lien has either been recorded in a County Recorder's office or has been filed in the California Secretary of State's office and that Notice has not been "released", the statutory lien is extended for an additional 10-year period from the date of filing or recordation of that Notice pursuant to the terms of Government Code section 7172. A subsequent Notice of State Tax Lien filed or recorded may have a different lien number from the previously filed or recorded Notice of State Tax Lien. In your letter, you have cited Revenue and Taxation Code section 6736 et sec. These sections permit the Board to obtain a court judgment for a tax liability. Once a judgment has been obtained, a judgment lien may be imposed on a taxpayer's property. The time limitations affecting judgment liens are not relevant in your particular case as no court judgment has been obtained for the tax liability of the M--- Company. Very truly yours,
THOMAS COOKE
Tax Counsel
TJC:plh
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace