Were American Eagle coins exempt from California sales tax merely because they were legal tender, and when could the bulk-bullion exemption apply?

Short answer No. Investment sales were taxable unless section 6355's monetized-bullion conditions were met, including the $1,000 market-value threshold and qualifying seller status.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 168.0005
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1986-10-20
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A requester asking whether newly issued American Eagle gold and silver coins would be subject to California sales tax (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 20, 1986 tax-counsel letter assumes American Eagle sales were not made by the United States and applies the then-$1,000 bulk threshold and registration rules quoted from section 6355. It invites documentation if the federal-government-sale assumption was wrong. Current exemption thresholds, regulations, seller status, and transaction structure control. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

American Eagle gold coins were legal tender, but they were expected to sell for amounts tied to their precious-metal value rather than be used solely as a medium of exchange. Tax counsel therefore treated ordinary investment sales as taxable unless a specific exemption applied.

The coins qualified as monetized bullion, so the historical section 6355 exemption could apply when a single transaction reached at least $1,000 in market value and was substantially equivalent to a national securities or commodities exchange transaction. The latter requirement depended on the sale being by or through a person registered under the Commodity Exchange Act or not required to register.

The conclusion assumed the sales were not made by the United States. The letter noted that a different federal-sale exemption could apply if documentation showed the United States was actually the seller.

Common questions

Did legal-tender status automatically eliminate sales tax?

No. Coins bought as investments rather than used solely as exchange media were taxable absent another exemption.

Did every American Eagle sale qualify as bulk bullion?

No. The transaction had to meet the market-value and qualifying-seller conditions stated in section 6355.

Could a direct federal sale receive different treatment?

Potentially. The letter invited documentation if the United States, rather than an independent retailer, made the sale.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6051, 6355, and 6352 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1599(a) (as cited)
  • Commodity Exchange Act (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

168.0005
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-445-5550

October 20, 1986
Dear Mr. REDACTED TEXT:
This is in response to your letter dated October 3, 1986 to Tax Counsel Les Sorensen in which you ask whether the sale of American Eagle coins will be subject to sales tax. Your letter states: “As you know, the United States government is about to issue the new Eagle series of legal tender coins. The gold series consists of four coins, a one ounce coin with a $50 denomination, a ½ ounce coin with a $25 denomination, a ¼ ounce coin with a $10 denomination, and 1/10 ounce coin with a $5 denomination. They are also minting a new silver dollar. The Federal legislation authorizing the striking of these coins specifically makes them legal tender of the United States of America. The Treasury Department’s press releases have indicated that they are exempt from sales tax due to the fact that they are legal tender coins. “The coins will be sold to the public through banks, brokerage firms, and coin dealers throughout the United States including California. The question that we present to you is whether the State of California will consider the coins exempt from sales tax.” DISCUSSION California Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers on their sale at retail of tangible personal property in this state, unless the sale is specifically exempted or excluded from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code $ 6051.) Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1599(a)(1) states: “The transfer of coins for use solely as a medium of exchange, i.e., as legal tender, is not subject to tax even though the transferee pays an amount exceeding the face value. For example, tax does not apply to a transaction where the coin changer returns only 95 cents on a dollar. On the other hand, tax does apply to the sales of coins as collector’s items or as an investment, except as otherwise specified in this regulation.” (Emphasis added.) As we understand the transaction in question, the coins will not be transferred for use solely as a medium of exchange. For example, the one ounce gold coin having a $50 face value will be sold for an amount over the market rate for one ounce gold (which is presently well in excess of $ 300 an ounce). This does not constitute use solely as a medium of exchange but rather is in the nature of an investment. Therefore, sales of these coins are subject to tax except as specified below.

Mr. REDACTED TEXT

-2-

October 20, 1986
168.0005

Revenue and Taxation Code section 6355 exempts from sales tax sales in bulk of monetized bullion “which are substantially equivalent to transactions in securities or commodities through a national securities or commodities exchange ....” (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6355(a).) Under subsection (c) of section 6355, American Eagle coins constitute “monetized bullion.” (See Reg. 1599(a)(3).) Under subsection (b) of section 6355, a “sale in bulk” has occurred if the amount of monetized bullion sold in the transaction totals, in market value, $1,000 or more. (See Reg. 1599 (a)(3)(A).) Under subsection (d) of section 6355, a sale is substantially equivalent to a transaction in securities or commodities through a national exchange if the sale is by or through a person registered pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act or not required to be registered under that Act. (See Reg. 1599(a)(3)(B).) Based on the information you have provided us, a sale of American Eagle coins is subject to sales tax unless it qualifies for the exemption provided in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6355, an important condition of which is that the total market value of the coins sold in a single transaction is $1,000 or more. However, we have previously concluded that sales of certain other coins were exempt from our sales tax because of the particular circumstances of their sale. For example, with regard to the sale of United States Liberty Coins, we were provided with the contract by which the United States sold those coins through a consignee to the purchaser. We concluded that the sales were by the United States itself and therefore exempt from sales tax under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6352. Our conclusion herein that sales of American Eagle coins are subject to sales tax unless qualifying for the exemption provided in section 6355 is based on the assumption that the sales in question are not by the United States. Enclosed for your information is a copy of Regulation 1599. If you believe that we would consider the sales in question as being made by the United States, you should forward to us sufficient documentation for us the make a proper determination. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to write us again. Sincerely, David H. Levine Tax Counsel DHL:ss Encl.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1986. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace