Were water meters sold in place with a private water system taxable when they stood on land the seller did not own but had a right to remove them?

Short answer Yes. The seller's removal right constructively severed the meters from the realty, so staff recommended leaving the tax determination unchanged.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 150.0680
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1956-09-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A petitioner challenging tax on water meters sold in place with a private water system (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1956. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1956
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This September 26, 1956 associate-tax-counsel letter recommends that the Board redetermine tax without adjustment after a preliminary hearing. The petitioner still had 30 days to request a Board hearing, so the letter does not show the final Board disposition. Current law, land ownership, the seller's legal status, and both parties' removal rights control. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A petitioner challenged tax on water meters sold in place as part of a private water system. The meters were located on land the seller did not own.

Associate tax counsel applied the Board's prior position that the seller's right to remove the meters constructively severed them from the realty. The in-place transfer was therefore a sale of tangible personal property.

Staff recommended that the Board leave the tax determination unchanged. The petitioner could still request a Board hearing within 30 days, so this was a recommendation rather than a shown final decision.

Common questions

Did leaving the meters physically in place prevent taxation?

No. The seller's removal right produced constructive severance under the stated policy.

Why did land ownership matter?

The seller did not own the land but retained the right to remove the meters installed there.

Was this the Board's final ruling on the petition?

Not in the supporting letter. It recommended no adjustment and preserved the petitioner's hearing option.

Citations and references

  • No statute, regulation, or case was cited in the supporting letter.

Source

Original ruling text

150.0680

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

September 26, 1956

L--- A--- D--- of W--- and P--P.O. Box XXXX, --- ----- --- XX, California

Attention:

-- XXXXXX
Now: SR -- XX XXXXXX

J--- P. B---

Gentlemen:
We have considered the petition for Redetermination and the information presented at the preliminary hearing with respect to the above matter. In the past we have ruled that the sale of water meters in place as a part of the sale of a private water system is a sale of tangible personal property when the meters are on land not owned by the seller. Our ruling is based upon the fact that the seller has a right to remove the meters and the sale constitutes a constructive severance of the meters from the realty. For this reason we will recommend to the Board that the tax be redetermined without adjustment. If you desire a Board hearing on this matter, please advise us within 30 days. Very truly yours,

John H. Murray
Associate Tax Counsel

JHM:rc
cc:

--- --- – Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1956. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace