Was a manufacturer's sale of installed relocatable classrooms with their ongoing leases subject to sales tax?

Short answer No, if the classrooms remained installed and the seller did not have to sever them. Installed classrooms were real property; uninstalled classrooms or buildings the seller would remove remained taxable personal property.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 150.0505
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-08-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A representative asking about a manufacturer's sale of leased relocatable classrooms to a partnership (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 21, 1990 senior-tax-counsel letter assumes the classrooms remained installed, their leases continued, and the manufacturer was not required to sever them. It contrasts uninstalled or seller-severed classrooms and says the section 6012.6 partial exemption applies only while factory-built school buildings are tangible personal property. Current law and sale terms control. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer planned to sell a partnership substantially all relocatable classroom buildings then leased to customers, mainly California school districts. The buyer would receive the building titles and assignments of the ongoing leases.

The letter treated an installed relocatable classroom as real property, whether installed on land owned by the classroom owner or the lessee. If the classroom remained installed under a continuing lease and the seller was not required to sever it, the sale was a real-property transfer and no sales tax applied.

An uninstalled classroom, or one the seller was required to remove from its location, remained tangible personal property and its sale was taxable.

The partial exemption in section 6012.6 did not apply to these assumed sales because that provision covered factory-built school buildings only when sold as tangible personal property.

Common questions

Did the buildings' relocatable design keep them personal property?

No. Once installed, the source treated them as real property.

When would a classroom sale be taxable?

When the building was uninstalled at sale or the seller was to sever it.

Did the factory-built-school partial exemption apply?

Not to the assumed real-property transfers.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6051 and 6012.6 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1596(a) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

150.0505

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-5550

August 21, 1990

Mr. D--- G----- & --XXXX --- --- Drive, Suite XXX
---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

S---, Inc.
SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Mr. G---:
This is in response to your letter dated July 30, 1990 regarding the application of sales or use tax to sales of relocatable classrooms by S---, Inc. S--- manufactures relocatable classroom buildings and then sells or leases them to customers, primarily school districts in California. Leases are usually up to three years in length, and at the end of the lease term, the buildings may be sold to the original lessee, leased again to the same lessee, or sold or leased to a different party. S--- intends to sell to a partnership substantially all its buildings currently under lease. The partnership will receive title to the buildings and an assignment of the existing leases. S--- will own 50 percent interest in the acquiring partnership and 50 percent will be owned by an unrelated party. You ask whether sales or use tax applies to this sale. Only sales of tangible personal property are subject to sales tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) After a relocatable classroom is installed, we consider it to be real property, whether it is installed on land owned by the owner of the classroom or on land owned by the lessee of the classroom. A sale of real property is not subject to sales tax, and the sale of a building affixed to land is only subject to sales tax if it is regarded as a sale of tangible personal property. This occurs only when the building is to be severed by the seller. (Reg. 1596(a).) When S--- sells an installed relocatable classroom which is subject to an ongoing lease and which S--- is not required to sever, S--- is selling real property and no sales tax applies to that sale. You state that the classrooms being sold by S--- are currently under lease. I assume that the sale will occur while the classrooms remain subject to those continuing leases and that S--- is not required to sever those classrooms from the real property. This no sales tax would apply to those sales. The sale of any classrooms which are not installed on real property at the time of the sale or

Mr. D--- G---

-2-

August 21, 1990
150.0505

which are to be severed by S--- from their existing location would be a sale of tangible personal property and would be subject to sales tax. You note Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012.6, which provides a partial exemption for the sale of factory-built school buildings. You believe that this only applies to the original sale of factory-built school buildings by the manufacturer and does not apply to subsequent sales in place of factory-build school buildings. We agree that this partial exemption applies only to sales of factory-built school buildings in the form of tangible personal property. Since S---’s sales will apparently be of real property, we agree that section 6012.6 does not apply. If you have further questions, feel free to write again. Sincerely,

David H. Levine
Senior Tax Counsel

DHL:wak

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace