When did a bank's repossessions, credit bids, auctions, and resales create California sales-tax and seller-permit duties?

Short answer A bank making at least three sales in 12 months needed a seller's permit. Its credit-bid acquisition was exempt only if held for resale without use, and later retail resale was taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 135.0030
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1988-09-29
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel asking about a California bank's repossessions, credit bids, auctions, and resales

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a September 29, 1988 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel response about a California banking institution's repossessions, auctions, and resales. It applies historical bank-tax, occasional-sale, resale-certificate, and seller-permit rules. Current thresholds, exemptions, and federal-bank rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Counsel explained that a bank exercising a security agreement's power of sale was a seller when it transferred repossessed property for consideration. If the bank made at least three sales during any 12-month period—whether of its own property or property sold under that power—it was engaged in business as a seller and had to hold a seller's permit.

Retail sales by the bank were subject to sales tax. The bank had the burden to show a transaction was not retail, ordinarily by taking a timely resale certificate in good faith or otherwise establishing resale treatment.

The bank could also become the purchaser when it credit-bid at its own auction. That acquisition was not a taxable retail sale if the bank acquired the property for resale and made no intervening use beyond retention, demonstration, or display while holding it for sale. Its later resale was taxable unless that later transaction also qualified as a sale for resale.

Common questions

Was taking possession of collateral itself described as the taxable sale?

No. The letter focused on the bank's sale under its contractual power and, separately, its acquisition by credit bid at an auction.

Did three auctions or three sales trigger the permit rule?

The letter used three sales within 12 months, whether the bank sold its own property or acted under a contractual power of sale.

Citations and references

  • California Constitution article XIII, section 27, and California Revenue and Taxation Code section 23182 (state-bank tax treatment, as cited)
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006, 6014, and 6066; Regulations 1595(a)(4) and 1699 (seller and seller's-permit rules, as cited)
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6007, 6051, and 6091; Regulation 1668 (retail sale, sales tax, and resale proof, as cited)
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6094 and Regulation 1669 (retention, demonstration, or display while holding for resale, as cited)
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 220.0080 (repossessions and power of sale, as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

135.0030

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-5550

September 29, 1988

Mr. A. M--- J--J--- & L--P. O. Drawer XXXXX
---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. J---:
This is in response to your letter dated September 7, 1988 regarding the requirements of the Sales and Use Tax Law with respect to repossessions and sales by a California banking institution. You ask: "1. Must the Bank hold a retail seller’s permit in order to repossess personal property in which the Bank holds a perfected security interest? "2. If the Bank repossesses personal property for the sole purpose of resale to third persons, does the repossession constitute a taxable event? "3. “If, rather than repossessing the property, the Bank conducts an auction and credit-bids in and acquires the personal property, which it intends to thereafter resell, does the purchase from the auction constitute a taxable event? "4. “Must the Bank hold a retail seller’s permit if it holds more than three auctions of personal property, during which auctions the Bank purchases the property for the purposes of resell? "5.

“If the Bank resells personal property, acquired through repossession or auctions, under what circumstances must it hold a retail seller’s permit?”

Initially we note that California Constitution Article XIII, Section 27 provides that the tax on state banks measured by their net income is in lieu of all other taxes except taxes upon real property and vehicle registration and license fees unless otherwise provided by the Legislature. The Legislature has so provided in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 23182, and beginning in 1980 state banks became liable for sales and use taxes. (See Reg. 1567.)

Mr. A. M--- J---

-2-

September 29, 1988
135.0030

Repossession is the power granted by contract to the holder of a security interest in property to take possession of that property upon default and sell the property to satisfy the amount of its security interest. When a bank repossesses property and sells it pursuant to its power of sale, it is a seller because it is transferring title to the property in exchange for consideration pursuant to its contractual power to do so. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6006, 6014, Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 220.0080 (5/3/50, 9/16/87).) A person engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property is required to hold a seller’s permit. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6066, Reg. 1699.) A person is engaged in business as a seller of tangible personal property if that person makes three sales within any twelve month period. (Reg. 1595(a)(4).) If the bank makes at least three sales in any twelve month period, whether those sales are of its own property or pursuant to a contractual power to sell, the bank is required to hold a seller’s permit. If the bank is required to hold a seller’s permit, the bank owes sales tax on its retail sales of tangible personal property measured by the gross receipts from those sales. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) A retail sale is a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business in the form of tangible personal property. (Rev. & Tax. Code 6007.) The burden of proving that the sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at retail is upon the bank unless it takes from the purchaser in good faith a timely resale certificate. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6091, Reg. 1668.) Thus, a sale by the bank is subject to sales tax unless it takes a timely resale certificate in good faith from the purchaser or establishes that the sale was not at retail. Since the bank may not actually hold title to the property prior to the sale, it can also be the purchaser of the property when credit bidding at an auction it has conducted. Therefore, when the bank credit bids to acquire personal property at an auction it conducts, that sale is subject to tax unless the bank establishes it was a sale for resale. Assuming the bank does not make any use of the property other than retention, demonstration, or display while holding it for sale in the regular course of business, the sale to the bank will not be at retail and will not be subject to tax. (See Rev. & Tax. Code § 6094, Reg. 1669.) When the bank resells the property, that sale is subject to sales tax unless it is not at retail. If you have further questions, feel free to write again. Sincerely,

David H. Levine
Tax Counsel

DHL:ss

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1988. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace