Could fully custom programming be excluded when bundled without itemization in a lump-sum sale of computer equipment?

Short answer Yes. The memorandum required a reasonable allowance for the custom-programming service even without itemization, while limiting the conclusion to noncanned programs.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.3670
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1984-11-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit staff asking about custom programming bundled with computer equipment for one lump sum

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a November 13, 1984 California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum about fully custom programming bundled with computer equipment. The same memorandum is separately published as Annotation 120.3088. The official variants conflict on one sentence: this PDF says section 6010.9(d) “does not require” separately stated charges for canned-program modifications, while 120.3088 says it “does require” them. This page does not resolve that conflict and limits its summary to the common fully custom-program holding. Current software, allocation, bundled-sale, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Audit staff asked whether custom programming furnished with computer equipment under one lump-sum contract should receive an allowance when the invoice did not separately itemize the programming.

California said the custom-programming charges were not taxable and instructed the auditor to make a reasonable allowance. The statutory exclusion and accompanying legislative finding treated fully custom programs as services, with storage media incidental, even when the service was mandatory and bundled with equipment.

The memorandum assumed the vendor was not supplying a canned program with custom modifications. Annotation 120.3088 separately publishes the same memorandum, but its official PDF conflicts with this version over whether charges for canned-program modifications must be separately stated. The common fully custom-program holding does not depend on resolving that conflict.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6010.9 (as cited)
  • California Statutes 1982, chapter 1274, section 4 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(k) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

San Diego – District Principal Auditor

From:

Headquarters – Legal
John Abbott

Subject:

Custom programming – sale of computer equipment

120.3670

Date:

November 13, 1984

In your September 11, 1984 memorandum to Gary Jugum, you write: As we discussed on September 6, we are confronted with a situation where custom programming is furnished along with computer equipment in a lump-sum contract. A separately stated charge for custom programming is not made on the invoice. Should an allowance for custom programming be made in the audit or should the custom programming be considered as services provided in conjunction with a retail sale? Our opinion is that charges for custom programming are not subject to tax in this case even where the charges are included in the sale of computer equipment without a separate statement or itemization of the programming charges. Therefore, we suggest that you make a reasonable allowance for these charges in your audit. We believe this result is required by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6010.9, which excludes custom computer programs from tax, and the legislative finding (section 4, Chapter 1274, Statutes 1982, which accompanied the addition of section 6010.9) that: sales and service of custom computer programs…are service transactions not subject to sales or use taxes under any existing state law. The use of any storage media in the transfer of custom computer programs is only incidental to the true object of the transaction, which is the performance of a service…. Since custom programs are excluded from tax, it follows that custom programming must also be excluded, in view of the legistlative finding that the storage media on which the custom programs are recorded do not affect the characterization of the transaction as the performance of a service.

San Diego – District Principal Auditor

-2-

November 13, 1984
120.3670

Please note, however, that this result only applies in a situation such as this, where (I assume) the vendor is not transferring a prewritten or canned program to the customer, together with custom modifications to that program. If the custom programming consists of modifications to a canned program, then section 6010.9(d) does not require that the charges for the modifications be separately stated. Under the facts you have presented, we believe that the intent of section 6010.9 has the effect of invalidating that part of Regulation 1502(k) which provides that programming services are taxable when those services are provided on a mandatory basis as an inseparable part of the sale of automatic data processing equipment.

JA:ss

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace