Were charges to maintain, update, reformat, and custom-modify a State Library database taxable?

Short answer No for the identified contract. Database processing and separately stated custom modifications were services, though sold lists and training guides remained taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.2620
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-11-29
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A California joint-powers agency maintaining the State Library's serials database

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a November 29, 1989 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel letter to an identified joint-powers government agency about its specific State Library contract. The letter says that taxpayer could rely on the advice under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596; that statement does not extend reliance rights to another taxpayer or different facts. It separately treated sold lists and training guides as taxable. Current database, government-contract, custom-software, refund, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The agency continuously maintained and updated a database owned by the California State Library, converted records to a new national library format, and developed custom software to improve database access. California treated maintaining and updating the continuous customer-owned file as nontaxable processing of customer-furnished information, even if the updated database was returned on tangible storage media.

Separately stated custom modifications to the database-access programs were also excluded. The agency was the consumer of cards, forms, and other property used to perform those processing and programming services and owed tax on its purchases of those inputs.

Lists and training guides sold to clients remained taxable retail sales. The letter said tax should not be charged on the excluded services and described a refund-claim route for tax already collected. Because the request identified the taxpayer and contract, the letter expressly treated itself as written advice on which that taxpayer could rely under section 6596.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(d)(5) and (f)(2) (as cited)
  • California Government Code section 6500 et seq. (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.2620
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

November 29, 1989
Mr. REDACTED TEXT
Executive Director
REDACTED TEXT
San Jose, CA 95112-4598
REDACTED TEXT – SR GH REDACTED TEXT
processing of customer-furnished information – maintenance
of library data base
Dear Mr. REDACTED TEXT:
In your September 20, 1989 letter to the Board’s legal staff, you request our opinion on the application of California sales or use tax to a contract entitled “California Data Base for Serials” (also referred to as CDB-S) between REDACTED TEXT and the California State Library. You request our opinion under the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6596 (taxpayer reliance on Board written advice). In your letter, you relate that REDACTED TEXT is a not-for-profit California government agency. Mr. Lerry Jakubowitz, of Peterson Associates, CPAs, your representatives, informs me that REDACTED TEXT is a joint powers government agency formed under the provisions of Government Code Section 6500 et seq., among the California State Library, the County of Los Angeles, the Regents of the University of California, and other government entities. The contract calls for REDACTED TEXT to continuously maintain and update a data base owned by the California State Library. The contract also provides for REDACTED TEXT to develop and implement custom software to improve the usefulness and availability of the data base. The contract also requires REDACTED TEXT to expand the data base to encompass the conversion of the records to a new national standard library format.

Mr. REDACTED TEXT

-2-

November 29, 1989
120.2620

You write:
“The California State Board of Equalization recently completed an audit of REDACTED TEXT for the period October 31, 1985 to December 31, 1988. The Notice of Determination was dated July 26, 1989. During this field audit at REDACTED TEXT, the CDB-S contract was reviewed and determined to be a contract for services, the proceeds of which were not subject to sales tax. However, since the contract is renewed on an annual basis we wish to have a determination as to the application of sales or use tax to the contract covering the period October 1, 1989 to September 30, 1990, and each subsequent annual renewal of the contract.” You note that you have requested the California State Library to remit sales tax on this contract for the period January 1, 1989 to September 30, 1989, and you ask us to advise you if that collection of tax is in error. Your contention is that this contract is exempt from sales and use tax under the Board’s Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(d)(5) because it constitutes the service of processing customerfurnished information by a data processing firm. You contend that the true object of this contract is for REDACTED TEXT to provide the service of changing the information included in the data base, and not the tangible output of the product which may result from accessing the data base (e.g. storage media containing the data base). Your opinion is that REDACTED TEXT is the consumer of tangible personal property which it uses in performing this contact, such as cards, forms, etc. You also contend that REDACTED TEXT is not subject to tax on services rendered in making custom modifications to the data base software programs, when REDACTED TEXT separately states these charges on its billing invoice, pursuant to the provisions of Regulation 1502(f)(2)(B). There are other provisions of the contract which require REDACTED TEXT to publish, market, and distribute the California Union List of Periodicals, and also to publish training guides for REDACTED TEXT members to efficiently access the data base. You understand that REDACTED TEXT is the retailer of these items and that tax applies to its sales to its clients. Opinion We agree with your contention that under Regulation 1502(d)(5), REDACTED TEXT is providing a nontaxable service of processing customer-furnished information when it maintains and updates a continuous file of information in the data base owned by the California State Library, regardless of whether REDACTED TEXT transfers the updated data base to the State Library on tangible storage media. We also agree that when REDACTED TEXT makes custom modifications to computer programs necessary to access the data base, and separately states these charges for the custom modifications on its invoices to the California State Library, no tax applies to those charges, under Regulation 1502(f)(2). REDACTED TEXT is the consumer of tangible property it purchases in order to provide these processing and programming services, and tax applies to those purchases. You should not charge the California State Library tax on these services, and if you have collected

Mr. REDACTED TEXT

-3-

November 29, 1989
120.2620

tax on nontaxable transactions, you may file a written claim for refund with the Board’s Audit Review and Refund Unit, P.O. Box 942879, Sacramento, CA 94279-0001, Telephone (916) 322-3040. We also agree with your view that your are the retailer of lists and training guides which you sell to your clients. Finally, we agree that this response to your September 20, 1989 letter constitutes written advice to the taxpayer within the meaning of Section 6596. Accordingly, you may rely on this advice in reporting and paying the appropriate amount of sales or use tax in your returns filed with the Board. Sincerely, John Abbott Senior Tax Counsel JA:jb

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace