Was creating a mathematical model of fingerprint minutiae a taxable physical-form conversion?

Short answer No. The model identified relationships among fingerprint points that did not previously exist in the supplied information, so it was original-information development.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.1325
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-07-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board petition staff asking about mathematical fingerprint models transferred on tape or disk

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a July 9, 1990 California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum to petition staff about creating a mathematical model from a customer's fingerprint and apparently transferring the result on tape or disk. The conclusion depended on the model adding locations and interrelationships of critical fingerprint points that did not already exist in the supplied information. Current biometric-data, digital-delivery, privacy, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The customer supplied a physical fingerprint. The taxpayer digitized it and constructed a mathematical model of the fingerprint's “minutiae”—the locations and relationships among critical points used for fingerprint matching.

California distinguished this work from simply moving unchanged information from tape to disk. The mathematical model did not previously exist in the customer's fingerprint information, so the taxpayer developed original information from customer-furnished data.

The work was therefore a nontaxable processing service under the cited rule, even though the resulting information apparently was transferred on tape or disk.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(d)(5) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

120.1325

To:

Petition Unit (BLM)

Date:

July 9, 1990

From:

David H. Levine

(916) 445-5550
ATSS 485-5550

Subject:

N--- I--- S--S- -- XX-XXXXXX
This is in response to your memorandum dated April 26, 1990. You ask whether the construction of a mathematical model of “minutiae” derived from the image of a fingerprint is the service of developing original information or the taxable conversion of customer-furnished data from one physical form to another (the information is apparently transferred on tape or disk). The auditor believes that tax applies to this transaction under Regulation 1502 because the information supplied by the customer is converted into a form usable by the customer’s computer. An example of this type of taxable transaction is the conversion of information on tape to the same information on a disk. That is, the conversion from one physical form to another with no change in the actual information. In this case, the customer provides an actual fingerprint. The taxpayer takes this fingerprint and translates it into a digitalized image of the fingerprint. As Supervising Auditor Michael Fontana explains in the report of his discussion on the disagreed audit: “”During this step a mathematical model of the ‘minutiae’ for each fingerprint is constructed. ‘Minutiae’ refers to the location and interrelationship of those critical points within the fingerprint that allow fingerprint matching. This mathematical model of the minutiae as determined during the conversion process did not previously exist within the information supplied by the customer.” (Emphasis added.) The developing of original information from data furnished by the customer is nontaxable processing of customer-furnished information under subdivision (d)(5) of Regulation 1502. Since that appears to be what happens here, we conclude that N--- performs a nontaxable service. If you have further questions, feel free to write again.

DHL:wak

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace