Was creating a mathematical model of fingerprint minutiae a taxable physical-form conversion?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The customer supplied a physical fingerprint. The taxpayer digitized it and constructed a mathematical model of the fingerprint's “minutiae”—the locations and relationships among critical points used for fingerprint matching.
California distinguished this work from simply moving unchanged information from tape to disk. The mathematical model did not previously exist in the customer's fingerprint information, so the taxpayer developed original information from customer-furnished data.
The work was therefore a nontaxable processing service under the cited rule, even though the resulting information apparently was transferred on tape or disk.
Citations and references
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(d)(5) (as cited)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/120-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/120-1325.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
120.1325
To:
Petition Unit (BLM)
Date:
July 9, 1990
From:
David H. Levine
(916) 445-5550
ATSS 485-5550
Subject:
N--- I--- S--S- -- XX-XXXXXX
This is in response to your memorandum dated April 26, 1990. You ask whether the construction of a mathematical model of “minutiae” derived from the image of a fingerprint is the service of developing original information or the taxable conversion of customer-furnished data from one physical form to another (the information is apparently transferred on tape or disk). The auditor believes that tax applies to this transaction under Regulation 1502 because the information supplied by the customer is converted into a form usable by the customer’s computer. An example of this type of taxable transaction is the conversion of information on tape to the same information on a disk. That is, the conversion from one physical form to another with no change in the actual information. In this case, the customer provides an actual fingerprint. The taxpayer takes this fingerprint and translates it into a digitalized image of the fingerprint. As Supervising Auditor Michael Fontana explains in the report of his discussion on the disagreed audit: “”During this step a mathematical model of the ‘minutiae’ for each fingerprint is constructed. ‘Minutiae’ refers to the location and interrelationship of those critical points within the fingerprint that allow fingerprint matching. This mathematical model of the minutiae as determined during the conversion process did not previously exist within the information supplied by the customer.” (Emphasis added.) The developing of original information from data furnished by the customer is nontaxable processing of customer-furnished information under subdivision (d)(5) of Regulation 1502. Since that appears to be what happens here, we conclude that N--- performs a nontaxable service. If you have further questions, feel free to write again.
DHL:wak
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace