Were charges for designing a software opening screen and an Internet home page taxable?

Short answer Taxable when the design arrived on tangible media, and not a resale merely because the client recreated it in software. Fax- or modem-only delivery was nontaxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.1180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-05-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A graphic-design and advertising company asking about a software opening screen and an Internet home page

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a May 12, 1995 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel letter about a graphic-design and advertising company creating a software opening screen and an Internet-service home page. The analysis turns on whether the client receives tangible property: disk or other media made the transfer taxable, while fax- or modem-only delivery did not. It also treats the client's recreation of the image as use rather than resale of the same property. Modern software, website, digital-design, electronic-delivery, advertising, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A design company created an opening screen for software its client would sell and a home page for an Internet-service provider. Each client planned to manipulate the electronic file and make the image interactive.

The source said neither transaction was a sale for resale. The software retailer used the design by recreating the image in its product rather than reselling the same tangible property, and the Internet provider similarly used the home-page design.

Delivery method controlled the tax result. A disk or other tangible medium made the design charge taxable. A file sent only by fax or modem, with no storage media or other tangible property transferred, was an electronic information transfer and was not taxable.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(f)(1)(D) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.1180

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION - MIC 82
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego

Telephone No.: (916) 445-6450
Fax No: (916) 323-3387

BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

May 12, 1995

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Ms. T--- P--F--- C--- R--XXX --- -----, CA XXXXX
Re:

F--- C--- R--SR --- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. P---:
This is in reply to your March 15, 1995 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by your graphic design and advertising company. You noted the two following situations: “1) Our client sells a software product at retail. We have been asked by them to design an opening screen for the software because they want it to be ‘designed’ and to look nice. We will give them the file electronically and they will program it to be interactive. It is part of the software product that is sold at retail. Is this then ‘for resale’? “2) Our client is an Internet service provider. Places on the Internet are defined by what are called ‘Home Pages’. A Home Page is the first thing you see when you go to a new site on the Internet. Our client has asked us to design their Home Page because they want to stand out and to look good. We will provide their programmer with an electronic file for them to manipulate and make interactive. Subscribers to our client’s Internet service pay a monthly fee. Is our work taxable?”

Ms. T--- P---

-2-

May 12, 1995
120.1180

The California sales tax is imposed on retailers at the applicable rate of the gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property in this state. As you know, when designers transfer designs embodied on tangible personal property, the charge is subject to sales tax. When you sell a design to a client who will use the image as an opening screen for software it sells (“software retailer,” herein) as you described in the first situation, your sale is not a sale for resale. A sale for resale occurs when a person sells tangible personal property to another person who sells that tangible personal property without any intervening use. When you sell a design to the software retailer, the software retailer does not sell that tangible personal property to another person; rather, the retailer uses the design by recreating the image on its software. Your sale of the design to the software retailer for that purpose is a taxable retail sale. Similarly, your sale of a design to the Internet service provider to use as a home page is a retail sale subject to sales tax. You note you transfer the file “electronically.” If that means you transfer the file to the client on a disk or any other tangible personal property, your transfer is a sale subject to sales tax. If you mean you transfer the file by fax or modem, and you do not transfer any tangible personal property such as storage media to the client, we consider such a transfer to be an electronic transfer of information and not a sale of tangible personal property. Sales tax would not apply to the charge in that case. (Cf. Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1502, subd. (f)(1)(D).) We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
cc:

--- --- District Administrator - --

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace