Which charges were taxable when a computerized service produced station reports and mailed customer thank-you or service-reminder cards?

Short answer Monthly processed reports were services, but printed cards were taxable; postage and mailing needed segregation, and cards mailed out of state were excluded.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.1160
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1982-05-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit staff asking about service-station reports, thank-you and reminder cards, agents, postage, and out-of-state mail

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1982. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1982
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a May 17, 1982 California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum to audit staff about an automobile-service-station marketing and reporting business. It separately addresses customer-information reports, printed cards, combined postage and mailing charges, discretionary retailer treatment for agent sales, and cards mailed to out-of-state addresses. Current direct-mail, agency, interstate-sale, data-processing, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Service stations sent weekly work-order data, which the business used to prepare customer listings and operational reports. California treated those monthly reports as nontaxable processing of customer-furnished information because the data was sorted and substantially tabulated.

Thank-you, reminder, and promotion cards printed and mailed to station customers were taxable tangible property. Because the per-card price combined printing, postage, and mailing, the audit could segregate nontaxable mailing components under the cited rule.

The Board also said treating the business as the statutory retailer for clients buying through independent agents was within the agency's discretion. Cards printed in California but mailed to out-of-state addresses were excluded from California sales tax, and the memorandum found no basis for use tax on those charges.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6015 and 6396 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1502(d)(5), 1504(c)(2), and 1620 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Sacramento – Auditing (L. Adams)

From:

Headquarters – Legal (RHO)

Subject:

W--- J. B--SR -- XX-XXXXXX

120.1160

Date:

May 17, 1982

Taxpayer provides certain computerized services for automobile service stations. It provides the client with work order forms, mailers and certain other supplies. Client sends a copy of work order on each lube job, etc., to taxpayer weekly. The customer name, address, car mileage, type of work, etc., is taken from work orders and entered into taxpayer’s computer. The computer produces and immediate “thank you” card which is sent directly to the client’s customer. A “reminder” card is sent to customer in 90 days informing him that it is time for servicing. A second reminder card may be sent in 30 days. According to information supplied with your request and the letter from Mr. D---, the client receives monthly customer listing printout, alphabetized and in zip code order, showing various data, such as work order breakdown, employee production, etc. This material also indicates the taxpayer charges the client a one-time fee of $125 for computer set-up, work orders and supplies. Thereafter clients are charged $.46 per card mailed ($.41 for special sales promotion cards), $.15 per page for the customer listing printout, and a
$10.00 per month management fee, plus shipping charges.
Per your request for advice, we conclude that the taxpayer is processing customer furnished information (Regulation 1502(d)(5)) when it inputs information from client work orders and produces a monthly report from this information showing customers listed in either alphabetic or zip code order, types of services provided, etc. We have previously held that listing by zip code, for example, is regarded as more than “reformatting”, as that term is used in Regulation 1502. Moreover, the information provided states that much more tabulated information is provided. Applying Regulation 1502(d)(5)(A), however, we conclude that the taxpayer is the retailer of the cards it prints and sends to the client’s customers and the charge it makes for printing the cards is subject to tax. Since the taxpayer makes a single charge which includes both printing, postage and mailing services, you are entitled to make some segregation of the total charge per Regulation 1504(c)(2).

Sacramento - Auditing

-2-

May 17, 1982
120.1160

You state that you intend to treat the taxpayer as a Section 6015 retailer with respect to the charges for some 60 percent of the clients who purchase the services through an independent agent (typically an accounting firm). We conclude that such treatment is within the discretion granted by Section 6015. You also state that while the taxpayer prints all the cards here and mails them from Sacramento, some agents, some clients, and therefore, some of the client’s customers are located in other states. After discussing the question with Mr. Jugum and Mr. Hennessy, it was concluded that the charges for cards mailed to customers at out-of-state addresses are exempt from sales tax under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6396 (Regulation 1620). Further, we concluded that we could find no basis for applying use tax. Thus, these charges should be excluded from the taxable measure. Please let us know if you feel there is some basis of imposing tax under these circumstances and we will be happy to reconsider the issue.

RHO:jw

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1982. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace