Were interactive corporate presentations delivered on disks or CD-ROMs taxable as motion pictures or computer programs?

Short answer They were computer programs, not qualified motion pictures. Fully custom presentations were nontaxable; modified prewritten programs depended on pricing and separate charges.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0930
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-06-20
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A new multimedia-production business asking about interactive presentations and digital artwork

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a June 20, 1995 California State Board of Equalization supervising-staff-counsel letter about a new multimedia business producing interactive training and sales presentations, digital illustrations, animation, and other artwork. Its answers depend on whether a presentation is created completely for one customer or modifies prewritten software, whether modification charges are separately stated, how much of the price represents customization, the medium used by an outside artist, and whether final artwork goes into a qualified motion picture or printed material. Modern software, multimedia, digital-art, motion-picture, resale, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The business delivered interactive corporate training and sales presentations on computer disks or CD-ROMs. Tax counsel said they were computer programs, not qualified motion pictures, because they ran on data-processing equipment and were not produced for display as motion pictures.

A presentation designed completely for one customer was a nontaxable custom program. For a modified existing program, separately stated custom-modification charges were nontaxable while the underlying presentation charge was taxable. Without separate modification pricing, the entire charge was taxable unless the work met the source's custom-program thresholds: the prewritten component was no more than half the new program's price if previously marketed, or recorded customization charges exceeded half the contract price if it had not been marketed.

The letter also addressed digital artwork. An outside artist's illustration or animation delivered to the business on a disk was a taxable retail sale because the business copied and used the image rather than reselling that same property. Artwork supplied for a qualified motion picture was treated as nontaxable production service, with the provider consuming any transferred diskette; artwork for printed materials was taxable.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6010.9 and section 995.2 (as quoted in the source)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1502(f)(2)(B), 1529(b)(1), 1529(b)(1)(B), 1529(b)(2), and 1540 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.0930

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION - MIC 82
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton

Telephone No.: (916) 445-6450
Fax No: (916) 323-3387

ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
────────

June 20, 1995

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. T--- S--M--- M--XXX --- ---, Suite XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. S---:
This is in reply to your March 20, 1995 letter regarding the application of sales tax to your charges for multi-media presentations. You note you and your wife started a new business on January 1, 1995. You provide to your clients video production, art direction, graphic design, custom computer programming, and multi-media productions. Your company will produce interactive corporate training and sales presentations that are custom computer programs you will deliver to customers on computer disks or CD ROMs. You asked whether you should charge your client sales tax on your charge for the presentations. The sales tax is imposed upon retailers at the applicable rate of the gross receipts from the retailers’ retail sales of tangible personal property in this state. Since the sales tax on your sales is imposed directly upon you as the retailer, whether or not you collect reimbursement from your customer is a matter of contract between you and the customer. We agree with your conclusion that, although the interactive presentation you provide to your client has some characteristics common to motion pictures, your transfers of them are not covered by Sales and Use Regulation 1529, Motion Pictures. Since interactive presentations are not produced for display, we believe they are not qualified motion pictures as defined in Regulation 1529 at subdivision (b)(1). However, we believe that the interactive presentations

Mr. T--- S---

-2-

June 20, 1995
120.0930

you produce to run on automatic data processing equipment qualify as computer programs. Whether or not the interactive presentations you transfer to your clients qualify as custom computer programs depends upon further facts. Revenue and Taxation Code 6010.9 excludes from the respective definitions of “sale” and “purchase” the transfer of a custom computer program: “‘Sale’ and ‘purchase,’ for the purposes of this part, do not include the design, development, writing, translation, fabrication, lease, or transfer for a consideration of title or possession, of a custom computer program, other than a basic operational program (as defined in Section 995.2), either in the form of written procedures or in the form of storage media on which, or in which, the program is recorded, or any required documentation or manuals designed to facilitate the use of the custom computer program so transferred. . . .” If you completely design and transfer the interactive presentation rather than modify a prewritten program, tax does not apply to your charge. If you modify an existing program, tax applies to your charge to your client for the presentation; however, tax does not apply to your separately stated charge for modification you made to the program for the customer. Further, if you modify an existing program and do not separately state your charges for custom modification, tax applies to your entire charge to the customer unless your modification is so significant that the new program qualifies as a custom program based on the following criteria: 1.

If you previously marketed the prewritten program, the new program qualifies as a custom program if your price for the prewritten program is 50 percent or less than your price for the new program.

2.

If you have not previously marketed the prewritten program, the new program qualifies as a custom program if your records show your charge for the custom modifications was more than 50 percent of your contract price to the customer. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1502, subd. (f)(2)(B).)

You go on to note that, when you create a multi-media presentation, you may hire an artist to create a digital illustration or animation specifically for your particular presentation. When the artist completes the illustration or animation, you copy it and incorporate the images into the presentation you transfer to your client. You asked whether sales tax applies to the artist’s charge to you. We assume the artist transfers the illustration or animation to you on a computer disk. In such case, the artist makes a transfer of title to, or possession of, tangible personal property for a consideration, and the transfer is a retail sale subject to sales tax. You may not give the artist a resale certificate, because you do not sell the artwork to your client. Rather, you use it to copy the images into the presentation. The sale of the artwork to you for your use and your sale of a

Mr. T--- S---

-3-

June 20, 1995
120.0930

presentation which may display a reproduction of the image, are two separate and distinct transactions. Finally, you note other companies will hire your company to design and create digital artwork. You believe that, if you create the artwork for final use in a video or film, under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1529, Motion Pictures, tax does not apply to your charge. You believe that, on the other hand, if you create the work for final use in printed materials, tax applies to your charge under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540, Advertising Agencies, Commercial Artists and Designers. When you create digital artwork and transfer it to a person to use in producing a video or motion picture film which qualifies as a “qualified motion picture,” you perform qualified production services as defined at subdivision (b)(2) of Regulation 1529. Tax does not apply to your transfer of the artwork. (Reg. 1529, subd. (b)(1)(B).) Rather, you are the consumer of property, such as a diskette, you transfer to your client. Tax applies to the sale of the property to you, or tax applies to your use of the property. If you have purchased the property under a resale certificate, you should report and pay use tax on your use of the property by reporting your cost of the property on line 2 of your sales and use tax return. You are correct that, when you transfer the artwork to a person to use to make printed materials, tax applies to your charge for the artwork. We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Supervising Staff Counsel
RLD:sr
cc:

--- --- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace