Was computer-created artwork taxable when an artist delivered it on removable disks or diskettes?

Short answer Yes. Seller-furnished media was a taxable property sale, and writing artwork onto client-furnished media was taxable fabrication; saving it only in the client's computer memory was not.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0661.175
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-12-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A Board audit supervisor asking about computer-created artwork saved to a client-furnished diskette

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an undated California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel memorandum published as Annotation 120.0661.175 with a December 2, 1996 annotation date. It distinguishes artwork saved only into a client's computer memory from artwork delivered on removable disks or diskettes, including client-furnished media. Modern digital-art, electronic-delivery, customer-furnished-property, and fabrication rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tax counsel distinguished artwork saved directly into a client's computer memory from artwork delivered on removable media.

When the artist created the work on the client's computer and saved it only in that computer's memory, counsel viewed the charge as nontaxable because the artist transferred no tangible personal property.

Delivery on an external disk or diskette was taxable either way. If the artist supplied the medium, the charge was for transferring tangible personal property under section 6006(a). If the client supplied a new or used disk, writing the artwork onto it was taxable fabrication or processing of customer-furnished property under section 6006(b).

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006(a) and 6006(b) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Memorandum

To :

Mr. J. W. Cornelius, Supervisor
Audit Evaluation and Planning
MIC:40

From :

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel

Subject:

[R]
S- --- XX-XXXXXX

Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82
Telephone No.: 445-6450

120.0661.175

This is in reply to your September 17, 1996 memorandum regarding the application of sales and use tax to charges for artwork created on a computer and transferred to a client on a computer diskette provided by the client. As you know, we have previously taken the position that, when an artist creates artwork on a client’s computer and saves the artwork into the computer’s memory, the artist’s charge is nontaxable. We do not believe the artist thereby transfers tangible personal property to the client. We do not reach the same result when the artist transfers the artwork to external storage diskettes or disks and transfers them to the client whether the client or the artist furnishes the removable disks or diskettes. When the artist furnishes the disks or diskettes, the artist’s charge for the disks is sales as defined at subdivision (a) of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006. The artist’s charge is for the transfer of title to or possession of tangible personal property for a consideration. If the client furnishes either new or used disks or diskettes, the artist’s charge for the work performed to create the artwork is a sale as defined at subdivision (b) of section 6006. The artist’s charge is for “producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting of tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish either directly or indirectly the materials used in the producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting.” RLD:sr cc: Mr. Dennis Fox

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace