Were Internet access and subscription fees for searching and viewing a résumé database taxable?

Short answer No on the stated assumptions. Customers used their own computers, while the provider transferred no equipment, software, or database information in tangible form.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0115.325
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-04-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A representative asking for an unidentified résumé-database business about Internet access and viewing fees

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an April 19, 1996 California State Board of Equalization staff-counsel letter about an unidentified business charging customers to search and view a résumé database over the Internet. Its conclusion assumes customers used their own computers, the provider retained possession and control of its database computers, and no equipment, software, or information copies were supplied in tangible form. Counsel expressly said a wrong assumption would change the answer. Modern database, subscription, online-information, and digital-product rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A business collected résumés and charged customers an access fee to search its database plus a subscription fee based on the number of résumés viewed.

Tax counsel concluded that neither fee was taxable on the stated assumptions. Customers used their own computers over the Internet, the provider kept its database computers solely in its possession and control, and it neither sold nor leased equipment or software nor supplied tangible copies of database information.

The letter explicitly warns that a different answer could follow if any of those assumptions were wrong.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006(g)(5), 6006.1, 6010(e)(5), 6010.1, 6051, 6201-6204, and 6401 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1660(c) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.0115.325

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 324-2637
FAX: (916) 323-3387

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles

April 19, 1996
Mr. D--- L. T--C--- & L--- L--XXX --- Street
--- ---, California XXXXX-XXXX

KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

E. L. Sorensen, Jr.
Executive Director

Re: Unidentified Taxpayer
Dear Mr. T---:
This is in response to your letter dated March 13, 1996 to Supervising Staff Counsel Ronald L. Dick regarding the application of tax on certain Internet transactions undertaken by an unidentified taxpayer (hereafter “Net”). You state that Net engages in the following activities on the World Wide Web: “⇒Net collects résumés at no cost from job fairs, the Internet and a variety of other sources for which no sales or use tax has been paid. “⇒Net gives customers access to a database of these résumés in order for them to conduct searches for potential employees based on job requirements. “⇒Net charges an access fee for the database search and a subscription fee based on the quantity of résumés (name and address) viewed. “⇒Currently, Net pays sales tax on purchases of consumables, supplies, and equipment. Net does not have a seller’s permit and does not collect sales tax from its customers for the previously described transactions.” You ask whether it “is necessary for Net to collect sales tax from its customers for either providing access to the résumé database and/or for viewing any résumés on line.”

Mr. D--- L. T---

-2-

April 19, 1996
120.0115.325

Discussion
California imposes a sales tax on a retailer’s gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property inside this state unless the sale is specifically exempted from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) When sales tax does not apply, use tax is imposed on the sales price of property purchased from a retailer for the storage, use or other consumption of that property in California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401.) A lease of tangible personal property in California is a continuing sale and purchase unless the lessor leases it in substantially the same form as acquired and has made a timely election to pay California sales tax reimbursement or use tax measured by the lessor's purchase price of the property. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6006(g)(5), 6006.1, 6010(e)(5), 6010.1, Reg. 1660(c)(2).) When the lease is a continuing sale and purchase because either or both of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied, the lease is subject to use tax measured by rentals payable. (Reg. 1660(c)(1).) The lessee owes the tax and the lessor is required to collect it from the lessee and pay it to this Board. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6202, 6203, 6204; Reg. 1660(c).) We understand from your letter that Net does not sell or lease any tangible personal property to its customers in the course of providing access to its résumé data base. That is, we assume that Net does not sell or lease to its customers any of the computer equipment or software necessary to access its database nor provide copies of any of the information from its database to its customers in tangible form. Rather, our understanding is that Net’s customers access from their own computers via the Internet Net’s data base which is maintained on computers solely within the possession and control of Net. (If our assumptions are incorrect, our answer would be different.) Under these facts, tax does not apply to Net’s subscription charge or access fee to its customers for viewing its résumé database since it is not selling or leasing any tangible personal property. If you have any further questions, please write again. Sincerely,

Warren L. Astleford
Staff Counsel

WLA:rz
cc: --- --- District Administrator - (--)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace