Were subscription graphs showing hospital-industry trends taxable printed property or a nontaxable data-compilation service?

Short answer They were taxable printed property. The graphs were prepared for any subscriber rather than one customer's special order and lacked literary content for periodical treatment.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0101.500
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1966-04-18
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An adviser asking about subscriptions to printed hospital-industry statistical graphs

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1966. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1966
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter whose first page is dated April 18, 1966 and whose continuation header says August 25, 1982. This page uses the complete letter's first-page date and discloses the conflict. The analysis concerns printed statistical graphs offered to subscribers, not remote database access despite the annotation title. Current data-service, publishing, periodical, healthcare-information, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The business gathered hospital room-use, rate, and other industry data, then produced printed graphs showing trends for individual hospitals or groups of hospitals. Subscribers could choose different scopes of information under their agreements.

California treated the transaction as a taxable sale of printed tangible property rather than a data-compilation service. The information was prepared for any subscriber who ordered it, not developed exclusively to one customer's special order, so the buyer's true object was the printed graph.

The graphs also did not qualify as periodicals because the described material contained no text or literary content. Quarterly or monthly issuance did not change that conclusion.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1501 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1590 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.0101.500

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-8900

April 18, 1966

Mr. R--- S. B-----, ---, --Accountancy Corporation
XXX --- ---, Suite XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. B---:
Re:

M--- I--XXXX --- -----, CA XXXXX
SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Thank you for your letter requesting advice on the application of sales tax to sales of hospital data in graph form. You state that: “The taxpayer is engaged in the business of compiling statistical data and providing the results to his clients in the following manner. The data gathered is based upon various aspects of the hospital industry, that is, room usage, rates, etc. This data is entered into a computer which sorts, compiles and stores the information. The computer prints this information in graph form showing various trends of a particular hospital or hospitals. These graphs are then provided to the various hospitals or other interested parties who subscribe to the service. The amount of information that is provided to each client depends upon the terms of the specific agreement with that client. For example, a hospital might want information that is gathered only for his particular hospital, or he might want the information on all the hospitals in his area. “Presently, the data is gathered, updated and provided to the subscribers on a quarterly basis. As the volume and demand for this service increases, it is planned to provide the service on a monthly basis.”

Mr. R--- S. B---

-2-

August 25, 1982
120.0101.500

You ask whether the described activity would be classified as a service enterprise under Regulation 1501. We conclude that the sale of printed hospital data in graph form to various subscribers is a sale of tangible personal property and not a service. Since the data will be prepared for sale to any subscriber who wishes to order it and will not be furnished to a single customer pursuant to that customer’s special order, the true object sought by the buyer is the printed material in its physical form and not the service of compiling the data. The graphs are just as taxable as are books or other printed matter. You also inquire whether the graphs qualify as exempt periodicals under Regulation 1590. Based upon your description, we assume that the data which will be furnished to subscribers on a quarterly or monthly basis will not include any text. We have consistently held that this type of material which lacks literary content, does not qualify as a periodical. We conclude, therefore, that the gross receipts from the sale of the described hospital data in graph form are subject to sales tax. Very truly yours,

Richard H. Ochsner
Tax Counsel

RHO:jw

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1966. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace