Is graphic art created on customer-furnished computer media taxable when used in tutorials or promotional programs?

Short answer Yes. Creating graphic art on customer-furnished computer media was taxable processing, although qualified motion-picture charges could be excluded under the stated facts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0055
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-01-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An adviser asking about graphic art supplied for computer tutorials and promotional programs

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a January 27, 1992 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel letter about graphic art, preliminary art, and motion-picture material supplied for computer tutorials or promotional programs. Its motion-picture conclusion depends on the former Regulation 1529 framework and the described producer-client relationship. Current digital-delivery, graphic-design, motion-picture, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The letter concluded that producing graphic art on customer-furnished computer media was taxable. California treated the work as producing, fabricating, or processing tangible personal property for the customer; the result did not change merely because the artist created the work by entering data onto computer media rather than working on paper.

Preliminary art could be treated as nontaxable under the stated regulatory procedure, but the letter warned against creating it on the same medium that would contain the finished art. If preliminary art became physically incorporated into the finished art, its charges were taxable.

The letter separately addressed motion pictures and videotapes used to make the computer program. Under the cited qualified-motion-picture rule, it viewed the producer as the consumer and said tax did not apply to that producer's charge to the client for the qualified motion picture.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(b) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(c)(4) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540(b)(4)(A) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1529 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.0055

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

January 27, 1992

Mr. W--- D--XXXX --- -----, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. D---:
This is in reply to your December 3, 1991 letter regarding the application of sales and use tax to charges for graphic art. You explained that you have a client who produces custom computer programs to be run on computers as tutorials or promotional programs. You note: “The tutorials generally are educational or promotional in nature and are generally transferred via electronic media, i.e. a computer diskette, and are run on computer devices only, i.e. computer, monitor, hard disk. No other tangible property is transferred.” We understand that your client contracts with another person to provide your client with the graphic art. You note that the graphic art may include the production of preliminary art, finished art, consultation and research, supervision, motion picture productions, photography, and videotaping. You interpret Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540, Advertising Agencies, Commercial Artists and Designers, as applying tax only to printed art and not to art included within customer computer programming. We disagree. Charges for producing graphic art are subject to tax whether the artwork is performed on paper or performed by inputting data onto computer media. Under section 6006, subdivision (b), of the Revenue and Taxation Code, “sale” means and includes the producing, fabricating, processing, or printing of tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish either directly or indirectly the materials used. The processing of customer-furnished computer media to embody graphic art or design for a consideration is a sale when such processing is performed for a consumer. (Reg. 1502, subd. (c)(4).)

Mr. W--- D---

-2-

January 27, 1992
120.0055

If the parties wish to follow the procedure in subdivision (b)(4)(A) of Regulation 1540 to consider charges for preliminary art as nontaxable, we urge that the vendor not attempt to create the preliminary art on the computer medium which will embody the finished art. As noted in Regulation 1540, tax applies to charges for preliminary art where the preliminary art becomes physically incorporated into the finished art. Since you note that some of the graphic art may be in the form of a motion picture or videotape, we are enclosing a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1529, Motion Pictures. Generally, tax does not apply to the transfer of all or any part of a “qualified motion picture” if the transfer is prior to the date that the qualified motion picture is exhibited or broadcast to its general audience. Subdivision (b)(1) of the regulation defines “qualified motion picture” to be any motion picture whether finished or not which is produced for exploitation in any medium or by any device for any purpose, including any industrial or educational purpose. We believe that the person who produces a motion picture or videotape for use in producing a computer program is the consumer of the motion picture or videotape. Tax does not apply to the person’s charge to the client for the qualified motion picture. We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
Encs.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace