Were editable training-course materials delivered on disk taxable when the software manufacturer acquired reproduction rights?

Short answer The word-processed manuscript portions were not taxable, but MacDraw graphics and overheads were taxable, requiring a reasonable allocation of the charge.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0048
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-06-14
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit staff asking about course materials developed for a software manufacturer

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a June 14, 1990 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel memorandum to audit staff about one independent-contractor agreement for training materials. It distinguished word-processed original manuscript content from MacDraw graphics and required a reasonable allocation to the graphic deliverables. It also said the output was not a custom computer program. Current publishing, digital-delivery, graphics, reproduction-rights, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The taxpayer developed an instructor-led course, workbooks, overheads, demonstrations, and sample files for a software manufacturer. The manufacturer would edit and produce the materials, market them under its own name, and receive reproduction rights. The deliverables were sent as word-processed disk files, with some overheads also supplied on paper and prepared using MacDraw.

California said these deliverables were not custom computer programs; the taxpayer merely used existing applications to create editable output. The word-processed text files were treated like an author's original manuscript transferred to a publisher. Their true object was expression of ideas, so delivery on computer media did not make them taxable.

Graphics and artwork were different. The true object was the graphic property itself, whether delivered on disk or paper and whether the customer could later edit it. A reasonable portion of the contract charge therefore had to be allocated to the taxable MacDraw-formatted deliverables.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1501 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

120.0048

To:

Mr. Ed Pedeupe
Audit Evaluation and Planning Unit

From:

John Abbott
Senior Tax Counsel

Subject:

K--- H---, Inc. – SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Training materials for computer programs – word processing and graphics

Date:

June 14, 1990

On March 15, 1990, you forwarded to the legal staff a memorandum from San Francisco Audit to Headquarters Principal Tax Auditor, dated February 26, 1990, concerning the above taxpayer’s contracts with software manufacturers, its customers. Your questions are whether the disks the taxpayer supplies qualify as custom computer programs, and if not, whether the taxpayer is contracting for a service or for the sale of tangible personal property. The San Francisco audit memorandum states as follows: “Background “Taxpayer sells off-the-shelf training materials for the more popular P.C. programs - - Lotus, Wordperfect, etc. These packaged classes are intended for use with a ‘live’ instructor and are sold as text files on computer disks. They are sold under taxpayer’s name and include limited reproduction rights. A typical package includes an instructor guide, workbook, overhead masters, and handouts. “Transaction in Question “Occasionally, taxpayer enters into a contract with a software manufacturer to merely develop a course for a program not yet on the market. This type of transaction differs from, the other - “Customer/manufacturer is required to edit the course material. Taxpayer transfers all reproduction rights. Customer/manufacturer markets the package under its own name.

Mr. Ed. Pedeupe

-2-

June 14, 1990
120.0048

“While we have historically taxed a transfer of a disk as a sale of tangible personal property, some recent cases (including C.A.D.) have recognized situations in which transactions may be viewed as much more than the sale of a disk. Inasmuch as this transaction has a strong service element - - manuscript for course, workbooks, overheads, and handouts – we’d like your opinion as to the application of tax to these custom courses. Agreement copies are attached for your reference. The memorandum enclosed an Independent Contractor Services Agreement Between A--- Corporation and the taxpayer dated December 30, 1987. Supplemental agreement no. 1 attached to the Services Agreement lists the following as the “deliverables” which the Services Agreement requires the taxpayer to produce for A---: “1.

Product Training Materials
“This product will consist of an Instructor Led Training Course to be used for classroom training of sales representatives. The text will focus on the features and benefits of the graphics package. The deliverables for the courseware includes:
•
•
•
•

“2.

“Disk containing Instructor’s Guide
Disk containing Participant’s Workbook
Disk containing overheads
Disk containing sample files

Reseller Workbook
“This product shall be used to promote the features and benefits of the product thereby enabling the resellers to effectively market the product. The reseller workbook shall consist of a scripted 10 minute demonstration with accompanying keystrokes and appropriate instructional lessons to teach the reseller how to do the demonstration.
•
•

Disk containing the Reseller Workbook
Disk containing sample files needed to perform the demonstration”

Schedule B attached to the Services Agreement sets out additional “assumptions” regarding the product training materials to be supplied by the taxpayer. Schedule B states in part: “All deliverables are word-processed disk copy, MS Word 3.01 for the Mac.

Mr. Ed. Pedeupe

-3-

June 14, 1990
120.0048

“The Overheads are word-processed disk and paper copy. They will be produced in MS Word 3.01 for the Mac and MacDraw. “A--- provides KHI, at no cost, Style Sheet Guidelines for Product Training Materials. “A--- handles production of materials.” Opinion In answer to your first question, the taxpayer is not transferring a custom computer program under the Services Agreement. Instead, the taxpayer is using two applications programs, Microsoft Word and MacDraw, to produce the deliverables called for under the Service Agreement. Schedule B specified the computer programs to be used by the taxpayer to produce the deliverables so that the customer can further process and edit the deliverables transferred by the taxpayer. The customer will have these same programs or other programs capable of reading the output produced by Microsoft Word and MacDraw. Our opinion is that the deliverables which consist of data in the form of word processed disk copy are not subject to tax. Under Regulation 1501, tax does not apply to an author’s transfer of an original manuscript to a publisher, since the true object of the contract is considered to be the expression of an idea, and not the furnishing of tangible property. It would make no difference whether the author transferred the manuscript on paper or computer readable storage media. Similarly, the taxpayer’s word processed disk copy is an original manuscript for use by A--- in producing the training materials. Some of the deliverables, whether encoded on storage media or printed on hard copy, consist of graphic material for overheads produced by the taxpayer using MacDraw, a graphics applications program. Our opinion is that tax applies to these deliverables. In the case of graphics or artwork, the true object of the contract is considered to be the tangible property on which the graphics or artwork is drawn. In our view, the same result applies regardless of whether the graphic output is on a disk and is thus capable of being edited or manipulated by the customer. Therefore, tax applies to a portion of the charges made by the taxpayer to A---, which represents an amount reasonably allocated to the MacDraw-formatted deliverables.

JA:jb

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace