Was a charge for researching current medical information and sending the client a computer printout taxable?

Short answer No. California treated the transaction as an information-research service; the printout merely transmitted the requested information and was incidental.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0030
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1988-07-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A medical-information researcher asking about database research and client printouts

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a July 26, 1988 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter about a business researching current medical information in databases and sending clients printouts. It addresses only sales-tax characterization of the described research transaction; it does not evaluate the accuracy, safety, licensing, or medical-advice status of the information service. Current research-service, digital-delivery, healthcare, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal, tax, or medical advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Clients supplied the medical name of an ailment, often while questioning a diagnosis, and the business researched current information in computer databases. It then sent a computer printout discussing the subject.

California applied the true-object test and concluded that clients were buying the research and information service, not the paper output. The printout was only the means of transmitting the information and was incidental to the service.

The research charge therefore was not subject to sales tax under the stated facts.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1501 (as cited)
  • California Business Taxes Law Guide Annotations 515.0660 and 515.0700 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

120.0030

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6414

July 26, 1988

Mr. G--- C--XXX XXth Street
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. C---:
This is in response to your letter dated June 16, 1988, in which you request our advice on whether charges you make for researching medical information are subject to sales tax. You describe your business in your letter as follows: “What I’m selling is a medical information service to the public – I’ll give you a sample business transaction. “Somebody would call me up and give ma a medical name of their ailment. They would most commonly question about the diagnosis that their doctor had given. We would research the most current medical information on the subject and send them a computer printout of the subject. They would pay for our research of the computer data-bases. That’s the business.” Generally, except where a sale is specifically exempted by statute, sales tax applies to a retailer’s gross receipts from all retail sales of tangible personal property in this state. (Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051.) However, sales tax applies only to the gross receipts from retail sales of tangible personal property and not to charges for the performance of services. (Sales Tax Regulation 1501.) In many instances, a service transaction requires the transfer of tangible personal property incidental to the performance of the service. When tangible personal property is transferred in connection with the service, the “true object” test is used to determine whether sales tax applies. If the true object of the transaction is the service itself, tax will not be imposed on the transaction even though some tangible personal property is transferred. However, if the true object of the transaction is the tangible personal property itself, the transaction will be taxable. (Sales Tax Regulation 1501.)

Mr. G--- C---

-2-

July 26, 1988
120.0030

This principle is illustrated by an example stated in Sales Tax Regulation 1501 as follows: “For example, a firm which performs business advisory, record keeping, payroll and tax services for small businesses and furnishes forms, binders, and other property to its clients as an incident to the rendition of its services is the consumer and not the retailer of such tangible personal property. The true object of the contract between the firm and its client is the performance of a service and not the furnishing of tangible personal property.” Similarly, we have stated in letter rulings that with respect to research and development contracts, if the development contract is primarily for the service of developing information, the ultimate recording of the information on paper under such contracts is incidental to the purchase of the service to develop the information. The development of information is not a sale of tangible personal property. It is a service. (Business Taxes Law Guide Annotations 515.0660 (3/11/66); 515.0700 (3/9/66).) It is our opinion that your business of researching the latest medical information for your clients is a service. The true object of the transaction is to provide the client with information. The computer printout is the means you use to transmit that information and is only incidental to providing the service of supplying medical information. Since the charges you make are for providing a service, they are not subject to sales tax. I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours,

Michele F. Hicks
Tax Counsel

MFH:jb

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1988. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace