Was converting customer drawings into editable mathematical CAD data a taxable data conversion?

Short answer No under the described facts. Editing, correction, computation, and raster-to-vector work produced new manipulable mathematical information, with the disk incidental.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 120.0023
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1988-12-20
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit staff asking whether CAD vectorization developed original information or merely converted data

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a December 20, 1988 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel memorandum about one CAD business. The same underlying memorandum is separately published as Annotation 120.0387 for its taxable drafting-only and pen-plotted-output holding; this page focuses on the materially fuller CAD service involving computations, editing, correction, and manipulable vector data. Current CAD, digital-delivery, information-processing, and sales-and-use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Customers supplied paper drawings, blueprints, sketches, and descriptions. The business edited and checked them, corrected errors, combined or redimensioned drawings, and converted raster graphics into vector data expressed through mathematical coordinates and parameters. Customers received disks they could manipulate with their own software.

California concluded that this was more than reformatting or moving unchanged information to another medium. The required computations and operator work developed original mathematical information from customer-furnished data, so the CAD service was nontaxable and the disk was incidental.

The result remained nontaxable when a pen-plotted drawing accompanied the CAD data. But drafting-only or pen-plotted-output-only transactions were taxable; Annotation 120.0387 separately indexes that issue from the same memorandum.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(d)(5)(A) (as cited)
  • Albers v. State Board of Equalization, 237 Cal.App.2d 494 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. O. D. Millette
Oakland District Principal Auditor

From:

John Abbott, Tax Counsel

Subject:

B--- I--- – SR --- XX-XXXXXX
Computer assisted design (CAD) services – transfer of drawings on disks

120.0023

December 20, 1988

This is in reply to your July 16, 1988 memo to Legal, in which you request our advice on the application of tax to B--- I---’ computer assisted design (CAD) services. You write: “The questionable area involved taxpayers manipulation of customer-furnished information and the specific question is does he develop original information which is exempt services or does he just convert data from one medium to another. “Our audit recommendation is that his work is taxable. Mr. G--- M---, President of the firm, disagrees, contending that his services are exempt.” You enclosed with your memorandum a letter from Mr. M--- to you dated June 29, 1988. Mr. M--- contends in his letter that his company’s CAD services constitute the processing of customer-furnished information, which is a service exempt from tax under Regulation 1502(d), and the fact that the services normally result in the transfer of disks to his customers should not result in the tax being applied. Mr. M--- writes in his letter as follows: “‘CAD Service’ as discussed in the audit, typically is comprised of the following activities: “1) Client furnishes B--- I--- with paper drawings, blueprints, sketches, written descriptions, etc. “2) B--- I--- takes client supplied ‘data’, and using micro-computer based CAD systems, manually edits, checks, and/or otherwise prepares composite drawings, detail drawings, and ‘layered drawings’ capable of further processing on customer owned equipment. Paper output from this process is incidental to the process and normally used only for verification of editing, etc.

Mr. O. D. Millette

-2-

December 20, 1988
120.0023

“3) B--- I--- returns to the client a magnetically coded disk with graphic lines, arcs, entities, etc. now capable of being mathematically manipulated (electronically); i.e. the drawing now has ‘intelligence’. In most cases we also will have corrected mistakes in the original drawing, made entirely new drawings based upon our operators interpretation of numerous drawings supplied by the client, rearranged and redimensioned drawings, and rescaled drawings. “The most important concept to understand, and the concept that underlies our contention that ‘new and/or original information is created in the CAD Service process is the concept of raster to vector conversion of graphic elements. “In laymen’s terms, raster elements are elements depicted as a series of points; e.g. a line drawn on a piece of paper is basically a series of little dots (or pixels) connected together. Vector elements are elements described by equations or discrete geometric parameters; e.g. a circle can be described by (the Cartesian co-ordinates of) it center point and its radius. It is immediately obvious that a drawing described in vector terms (a CAD drawing) is fundamentally different, more ‘intelligent’, and basically ‘new’ in content as compared to the paper drawing which is presented in raster form.” Mr. M--- also writes: “The Board of Equalization must recognize that CAD Service as described above is fundamentally different from manual copying, photocopying, optical scanning, blueprint reproduction, etc. Even optical scanning produces a raster image that has little intelligence. Simply copying the drawing using any of the above techniques typically costs about 2% - 10% as much as CAD Service, e.g. our typical charge for vectorizing an “E-Size’ drawing is between $600 and $800. We estimate that simply copying a drawing using the above techniques would cost from $5.00 (Blueprinting) to less than $75.00 (Photocopying). “From a commercial standpoint we feel that the foregoing provides some common sense credence to our contention that CAD Service creates original information since it is unlikely that clients would pay us $800 for merely reproducing their original drawings whe, if their objective was simply to obtain copies, they could achieve the same result for between $5.00 and $75.00.”


“We also feel that, at the less technical level implied by 1502-d-5-(B), our CAD Service typically involves sufficient operator discretion, editing, error correcting, development of original ‘composite items’ from multiple drawings, development

Mr. O. D. Millette

-3-

December 20, 1988
120.0023

of detail items from complex drawings, etc. to distinguish CAD Service from the activities of merely reformatting, printing, data medium conversion, or preparation of graphic materials without creations of original information.” Opinion We agree with Mr. M---’ contention that the CAD Services performed by B--- I--- constitute nontaxable processing of customer-furnished information pursuant to Regulation 1502(d)(5)(A), and the disks on which B--- I--- transfers the information produced by the CAD services are incidental to those services. We regard the transactions described by Mr. M---’ letter as constituting more than simply the reformatting or conversion of data from one medium to another. When the customer supplies B--- I--- with drawings, blueprints, sketches, and written descriptions, and receives in return a disk produced by the use of CAD software, the information contained on that disk is expressed mathematically rather than graphically. This constitutes the type of service described in subdivision (d)(5)(A) because the taxpayer was required to make computations from the information supplied by the customer. Because the customer receives the information in the form of mathematical data, the customer can now manipulate that data through the use of its own computer programs. The service remains nontaxable even if B--- I--supplies a pen plotted drawing together with the CAD data on the disk. Please note, however, that when B--- I--- provides drafting services only, or provides pen plotted drawings only, charges for these transactions remain subject to tax. Both of these types of transactions constitute mere reformatting of data or converting data from one form to another, and are taxable under the rationale set out in Albers v. State Board of Equalization, 237 Cal.App.2d 494.

JA:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1988. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace